Gender, Violence and Technology: At a Conceptual and Empirical Crossroad
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
TFSV should be treated with the same urgency as offline violence as its impact is similar, and in some cases, is even more heightened.
“For that reason, researchers that TFSV should be treated with the same urgency as offline violence as its impact is similar, and in some cases, is even more heightened (Powell, Flynn, and Sugiura 2021).”
From Technology-facilitated sexual violence perpetration as a tool for gender policing in secondary schools (2026) · cites this paper as Powell, Flynn, and Sugiura 2021
TFSV behaviours are rooted in deep-seated issues including patriarchy and rape culture.
“These behaviours, however, are rooted in far more deep-seated issues including patriarchy and rape culture (Powell, Flynn, and Sugiura 2021).”
From Technology-facilitated sexual violence perpetration as a tool for gender policing in secondary schools (2026) · cites this paper as Powell, Flynn, and Sugiura 2021
Technology is not the cause of TFSV; rather, it creates another avenue through which sexual violence may be perpetrated.
“It is important to note that technology is not the cause of TFSV; rather, it creates another avenue through which sexual violence may be perpetrated (Powell, Flynn, and Sugiura 2021).”
From Technology-facilitated sexual violence perpetration as a tool for gender policing in secondary schools (2026) · cites this paper as Powell, Flynn, and Sugiura 2021
Cites
Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Violence against Women of Color
Crenshaw, K. (1991) · Stanford Law Review · doi:10.2307/1229039 · Cited by 29,585 · see citing works
Toward a Field of Intersectionality Studies: Theory, Applications, and Praxis
Cho, S., Crenshaw, K. W., & McCall, L. (2013) · Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society · doi:10.1086/669608 · Cited by 4,126 · see citing works
Digital inequalities and why they matter
Robinson, L., Cotten, S. R., Ono, H., Quan-Haase, A., Mesch, G., Chen, W., Schulz, J., Hale, T. M., & Stern, M. J. (2015) · Information, Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/1369118x.2015.1012532 · Cited by 1,216 · see citing works
Resisting rape culture in digital society
Powell, A., & Sugiura, L. (2018) · The Routledge International Handbook of Violence Studies · doi:10.4324/9781315270265-42 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Almanssori, S., Paskaran, L., & Mendes, K. (2026) · Journal of Youth Studies · doi:10.1080/13676261.2025.2531789 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
- Authors
- Powell, A., Flynn, A., & Sugiura, L.
- Affiliations
- RMIT University (AU)
- Monash University (AU)
- University of Portsmouth (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Powell, Anastasia
- Venue
- The Palgrave Handbook of Gendered Violence and Technology
- Publisher
- Springer International Publishing
- Published
- 2021
- Pages
- 1-15
- OpenAlex
- W4205226359
- Cited by
- 4
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2021: 1
- FWCI
- 3.63
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Springer eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Stalking, Cyberstalking, and Harassment
- Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender, Feminism, and Media
- Keywords
- gendered technology, technology-facilitated abuse, gender-based violence, intimate partner violence, online abuse
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
