The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Human-Centered AI: A New Synthesis
Open accessOverview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The domain of Human-centered AI HCAI calls to actively involve people in AI design to ensure systems better reflect the values, preferences and needs of users, and other impacted stakeholders (e.g., [4, 8, 16, 99, 101, 104, 110]).”
From Engaging Communities Meaningfully in Defining Disability Representation for AI Image Generation (2026) · cites this paper as [101]
Citations
Cites
Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence: Reliable, Safe & Trustworthy
Shneiderman, B. (2020) · International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2020.1741118 · Cited by 1,743
Self-citationShneiderman, B. (2022) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780192845290.001.0001 · Cited by 1,185
Self-citationShneiderman, B. (2020) · ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems · doi:10.1145/3419764 · Cited by 768
Self-citationDesign Lessons From AI’s Two Grand Goals: Human Emulation and Useful Applications
Shneiderman, B. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Technology and Society · doi:10.1109/tts.2020.2992669 · Cited by 128
Self-citationThe dangers of faulty, biased, or malicious algorithms requires independent oversight
Shneiderman, B. (2016) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1618211113 · Cited by 73
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Understanding Human-Centred AI: a review of its defining elements and a research agenda
Schmager, S., Pappas, I. O., & Vassilakopoulou, P. (2025) · Behaviour and Information Technology · doi:10.1080/0144929x.2024.2448719 · Cited by 215
A Situation Awareness Perspective on Human-AI Interaction: Tensions and Opportunities
Jiang, J., Karran, A. J., Coursaris, C. K., Léger, P., & Beringer, J. (2022) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2022.2093863 · Cited by 140
Guo, Y., Liu, L., Huang, W., Shen, M., Yi, X., Zhang, J., & Lu, S. (2024) · Heritage Science · doi:10.1186/s40494-024-01363-6 · Cited by 34
Vishwarupe, V., Maheshwari, S., Deshmukh, A., Mhaisalkar, S., Joshi, P. M., & Mathias, N. (2022) · Procedia Computer Science · doi:10.1016/j.procs.2022.08.111 · Cited by 28
Toward More Human-Like AI Communication: A Review of Emergent Communication Research
Brandizzi, N. (2023) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2023.3339656 · Cited by 23
Metadata
- Authors
- Shneiderman, B.
- Affiliations
- University of Maryland, College Park (US)
- Corresponding author
- Shneiderman, Ben
- ORCID
- Shneiderman, Ben
- Venue
- Lecture Notes in Computer Science
- Publisher
- Springer International Publishing
- Published
- 2021
- Volume
- LNCS-12932
- Issue
- Part I
- Pages
- 3-8
- ISSN
- 0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
- 1611-3349
- OpenAlex
- W3194504147
- Cited by
- 27
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2
- FWCI
- 2.49
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- inria.hal.science
- Locations
- Lecture notes in computer science (publishedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Artificial Intelligence Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
- Keywords
- human-centered AI, human-centered design, AI ethics, basic needs, AI product design, sustainable communities, environmental restoration, human-AI collaboration
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
