The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Ethical AI for Social Good
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Recognized as a pivotal principle of ethical AI (Akula & Garibay, 2021; Floridi et al., 2018), AI for social good encompasses the motivation and behavioral tendency to ethically use AI in a manner that promotes positive social outcomes.”
From Assessment of AI ethical reflection: the development and validation of the AI ethical reflection scale (AIERS) for university students (2025) · cites this paper as Akula & Garibay, 2021
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
How AI can be a force for good
Taddeo, M., & Floridi, L. (2018) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aat5991 · Cited by 760
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 13
- Al-Abdulkarim, L., Atkinson, K., Bench-Capon, T.: Factors, issues and values: revisiting reasoning with cases. In: Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, pp. 3–12 (2015) · DOI
- Burns, A., Rabins, P.: Carer burden in dementia. Int. J. Geriatr. Psychiatry 15(S1), S9–S13 (2000) · DOI
- Butler, D.: Ai summit aims to help world’s poorest. Nat. News 546(7657), 196 (2017) · DOI
- Eicher, B., Polepeddi, L., Goel, A.: Jill Watson doesn’t care if you’re pregnant: grounding AI ethics in empirical studies. In: Proceedings of the 2018 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society, pp. 88–94 (2018) · DOI
- Fang, F., et al.: Deploying paws: field optimization of the protection assistant for wildlife security. In: Twenty-Eighth IAAI Conference (2016) · DOI
- Lakkaraju, H., et al.: A machine learning framework to identify students at risk of adverse academic outcomes. In: Proceedings of the 21th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pp. 1909–1918 (2015) · DOI
- Lu, H., et al.: A mathematical-descriptor of tumor-mesoscopic-structure from computed-tomography images annotates prognostic-and molecular-phenotypes of epithelial ovarian cancer. Nat. Commun. 10(1), 1–11 (2019) · DOI · Paper page
- Mathur, V., Stavrakas, Y., Singh, S.: Intelligence analysis of Tay twitter bot. In: 2016 2nd International Conference on Contemporary Computing and Informatics (IC3I), pp. 231–236. IEEE (2016) · DOI
- Oliver, N.: Big data for social good: opportunities and challenges. In: 12th World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Symposium (WTIS 2014) [Date of reference 20 May 2015] (2014). http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Documents/events/wtis2014/003INF-E.pdf
- Petersen, E.E., et al.: Vital signs: pregnancy-related deaths, united states, 2011–2015, and strategies for prevention, 13 states, 2013–2017. Morb. Mortal. Wkly Rep. 68(18), 423 (2019)
- Taddeo, M., Floridi, L.: Regulate artificial intelligence to avert cyber arms race (2018) · DOI
- Yadav, A., et al.: POMDPs for assisting homeless shelters – computational and deployment challenges. In: Osman, N., Sierra, C. (eds.) AAMAS 2016. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 10003, pp. 67–87. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46840-2_5 · DOI
- Zhou, W., Kapoor, G.: Detecting evolutionary financial statement fraud. Decis. Support Syst. 50(3), 570–575 (2011) · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Sorted by citations
What is Human-Centered about Human-Centered AI? A Map of the Research Landscape
Capel, T., & Brereton, M. (2023) · Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3544548.3580959 · Cited by 228
Wang, Z., Chai, C.-S., Li, J., & Lee, V. W. Y. (2025) · International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education · doi:10.1186/s41239-025-00519-z · Cited by 78
Metadata
- Authors
- Akula, R., & Garibay, I.
- Venue
- Lecture Notes in Computer Science
- Publisher
- Springer International Publishing
- Published
- 2021
- Pages
- 369-380
- ISSN
- 0302-9743
- 1611-3349
- Cited by
- 8
- References
- 1
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
