Structured Reporting in Radiology
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Reporting and Data Systems (RADS) were developed to standardize imaging reports for various organs, especially focusing on cancer detection, providing structured reporting formats and risk stratification to improve communication between radiologists and referring clinicians.
“Similarly, the Reporting and Data Systems (RADS) were developed to standardize imaging reports for various organs, especially focusing on cancer detection, providing structured reporting formats and risk stratification to improve communication between radiologists and referring clinicians [161,162].”
From Toward Safer Diagnoses: A SEIPS-Based Narrative Review of Diagnostic Errors (2026) · cites this paper as [162]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
Cited by 7
- Venue
- Imaging Informatics for Healthcare Professionals
- Publisher
- Springer International Publishing
- Published
- 2022
- ISSN
- 2662-1541 (ISSN-L)
- 2662-155X
- OpenAlex
- W4211135208
- Cited by
- 7
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 2.45
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Imaging informatics for healthcare professionals (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Radiology practices and education
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
- Keywords
- structured reporting, radiology reporting, electronic reporting, radiology informatics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
