Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 5Logic, Reasoning, and KnowledgeAnomaly Detection Techniques and ApplicationsData Mining Algorithms and Applications

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Modelling the Outlier Detection Problem in ASP(Q)

Bellusci, Pierpaolo, Mazzotta, Giuseppe, Ricca, Francesco·2022·Lecture Notes in Computer Science

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-030-94479-7_2

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 5

Metadata

Authors
Bellusci, P., Mazzotta, G., & Ricca, F.
Affiliations
University of Calabria (IT)
Corresponding author
Mazzotta, Giuseppe
Venue
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
Published
2022
Pages
15-23
ISSN
  • 0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
  • 1611-3349
OpenAlex
W4205210833
Cited by
5
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 5
FWCI
0.00
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
Locations
  • Lecture notes in computer science (publishedVersion)
  • Archive of Doctoral Theses and Digital Collections (University of Calabria) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Data Mining Algorithms and Applications
Keywords
outlier detection, knowledge discovery, declarative modeling, scalability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.