Cited by 10Information Retrieval and Search BehaviorRecommender Systems and TechniquesWeb Data Mining and Analysis

WANDS: Dataset for Product Search Relevance Assessment

Chen, Yan, Liu, Shujian, Liu, Zheng, Sun, Weiyi, Baltrunas, Linas, Schroeder, Benjamin·2022·Lecture Notes in Computer Science

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-030-99736-6_9

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Existing e-commerce datasets target retrieval relevance and use short, keyword-style queries, which do not resemble realistic interactions with shopping agents.

    “Existing e-commerce datasets target retrieval relevance and use short, keyword-style queries (Papenmeier et al., 2021; Chen et al., 2022; Reddy et al., 2022), which do not resemble realistic interactions with shopping agents.”

    From E-GEO: A Testbed for Generative Engine Optimization in E-Commerce (2025) · cites this paper as Chen et al., 2022

  • WANDS and ESCI average ∼3-3.5 words in a single sentence and Papenmeier et al. (2021)'s queries average ∼33 words, while E-GEO queries average ∼59 words.

    “Quantitatively, WANDS (Chen et al., 2022) and ESCI (Reddy et al., 2022) average ∼ 3-3.5 words in a single sentence and Papenmeier et al. (2021)'s queries average ∼ 33 words , while E-GEO queries average ∼ 59 words (Table 2, which also lists representative example queries).”

    From E-GEO: A Testbed for Generative Engine Optimization in E-Commerce (2025) · cites this paper as Chen et al., 2022

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chen, Y., Liu, S., Liu, Z., Sun, W., Baltrunas, L., & Schroeder, B.
Corresponding author
Chen, Yan
Venue
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
Published
2022
Pages
128-141
ISSN
  • 0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
  • 1611-3349
OpenAlex
W4225565720
Cited by
10
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1
FWCI
2.01
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Lecture notes in computer science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information Retrieval and Search Behavior
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Recommender Systems and Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Web Data Mining and Analysis
Keywords
search result relevance, e-commerce search, product search, cross-references, search engine evaluation, click logs

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review