The DOI matches its Crossref record; 199 of the 203 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Measuring User Engagement
Open accessOverview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Our analysis investigates the return rate and time spent on the platform, key metrics for social media platforms (62)”
From Reranking partisan animosity in algorithmic social media feeds alters affective polarization (2025) · cites this paper as [62]
Citations
Cites
Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales.
Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063 · Cited by 32,433
The Structure and Function of Complex Networks
Newman, M. E. J. (2003) · SIAM Review · doi:10.1137/s003614450342480 · Cited by 18,719
Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of Empirical and Theoretical Research
(1988) · Advances in Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0166-4115(08)62386-9 · Cited by 15,003
The weirdest people in the world?
Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A. (2010) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x0999152x · Cited by 12,641
Qualitative research: Methods in the social sciences
(2006) · PsycEXTRA Dataset · doi:10.1037/e668352010-001 · Cited by 10,619
Ellison, N. B., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2007) · Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00367.x · Cited by 9,939
SUS: A 'Quick and Dirty' Usability Scale
(1996) · Usability Evaluation In Industry · doi:10.1201/9781498710411-35 · Cited by 8,989
Rogelberg, S. G. (2007) · Sage eBooks · doi:10.4135/9781412952651.n55 · Cited by 5,309
Agarwal, R., & Karahanna, E. (2000) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3250951 · Cited by 4,726
Ericsson (1993) · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.87.3.215 · Cited by 4,539
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Nahum-Shani, I., Smith, S. N., Spring, B. J., Collins, L. M., Witkiewitz, K., Tewari, A., & Murphy, S. A. (2018) · Annals of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1007/s12160-016-9830-8 · Cited by 2,171
O’Brien, H. L., Cairns, P., & Hall, M. (2018) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2018.01.004 · Cited by 1,014
Self-citationUnderstanding the Long-Term Use of Smart Speaker Assistants
Bentley, F., Luvogt, C., Silverman, M., Wirasinghe, R., White, B., & Lottridge, D. (2018) · Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies · doi:10.1145/3264901 · Cited by 316
The Effectiveness of Prompts to Promote Engagement With Digital Interventions: A Systematic Review
Alkhaldi, G., Hamilton, F. L., Lau, R., Webster, R., Michie, S., & Murray, E. (2016) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.4790 · Cited by 273
Reinforcement Learning to Optimize Long-term User Engagement in Recommender Systems
Zou, L., Xia, L., Ding, Z., Song, J., Liu, W., & Yin, D. (2019) · ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD) · doi:10.1145/3292500.3330668 · Cited by 257
Metadata
- Authors
- Lalmas, M., O’Brien, H., & Yom-Tov, E.
- Affiliations
- Yahoo (United States) (US)
- ORCID
- Lalmas, Mounia
- Venue
- Synthesis Lectures on Information Concepts, Retrieval, and Services
- Publisher
- Springer International Publishing
- Published
- 2015
- ISSN
- 1947-945X (ISSN-L)
- 1947-9468
- OpenAlex
- W2090955639
- Cited by
- 192
- References
- 203
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 5
- FWCI
- 5.19
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hdl.handle.net
- Licence
- Locations
- Synthesis lectures on information concepts, retrieval, and services (publishedVersion)
- CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
- cIRcle (University of British Columbia) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Digital Marketing and Social Media
- Keywords
- user engagement, user experience, web application, engagement measurement, user interaction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
