Adversarial Collaboration
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Manuscripts reporting the results of an adversarial collaboration often provide the opportunity for protagonists to outline their own interpretations of the results.
“Often, manuscripts reporting the results of an adversarial collaboration provide the opportunity for protagonists to outline their own interpretations of the results”
From Integrated information and predictive processing theories of consciousness: An adversarial collaborative review (2026) · cites this paper as Rakow, 2022
Cites
HARKing: Hypothesizing after the results are known
Kerr, N. L. (1998) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr0203_4 · Cited by 1,989 · see citing works
Consequences of prejudice against the null hypothesis.
Greenwald, A. G. (1975) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/h0076157 · Cited by 1,022 · see citing works
Cognitive Therapy vs Medications in the Treatment of Moderate to Severe Depression
DeRubeis, R. J., Hollon, S. D., Amsterdam, J. D., Shelton, R. C., Young, P. R., Salomon, R. M., O’Reardon, J. P., Lovett, M. L., Gladis, M. M., Brown, L. L., et al. (2005) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.62.4.409 · Cited by 989 · see citing works
Cognitive Behavioral Group Therapy vs Phenelzine Therapy for Social Phobia: 12-Week Outcome
Heimberg, R. G., Liebowitz, M. R., Hope, D. A., Schneier, F. R., Holt, C. S., Welkowitz, L. A., Juster, H. R., Campeas, R., Bruch, M. A., Cloitre, M., et al. (1998) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.55.12.1133 · Cited by 585 · see citing works
Do frequency representations eliminate conjunction effects? An exercise in adversarial collaboration
Mellers, B., Hertwig, R., & Kahneman, D. (2001) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00350 · Cited by 448 · see citing works
Testing competing models of loss aversion: an adversarial collaboration
Bateman, I., Kahneman, D., Munro, A., Starmer, C., & Sugden, R. (2005) · Journal of Public Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2004.06.013 · Cited by 208 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Generative adversarial collaborations: a new model of scientific discourse
Peters, B., Blohm, G., Haefner, R., Isik, L., Kriegeskorte, N., Lieberman, J. S., Ponce, C. R., Roig, G., & Peters, M. A. K. (2025) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2024.10.015 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Corcoran, A. W., Haun, A. M., Dorman, R., Tononi, G., Friston, K. J., & Pennartz, C. M. A. (2026) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2026.106742 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
- Authors
- Rakow, T.
- Affiliations
- King's College London (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Rakow, Tim
- ORCID
- Rakow, Tim
- Venue
- Avoiding Questionable Research Practices in Applied Psychology
- Publisher
- Springer International Publishing
- Published
- 2022
- Pages
- 359-377
- OpenAlex
- W4292737005
- Cited by
- 13
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2016: 1
- FWCI
- 12.37
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Springer eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Academic Publishing and Open Access
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Research Data Management Practices
- Keywords
- adversarial collaboration, scientific controversy, open science, research transparency, hypothesis specification, research design, data analysis, study interpretation, research reporting, scientific rigor
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
