Comparing the Accuracy of ACE and WER Caption Metrics When Applied to Live Television Captioning
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Wells et al. [2022] could not find a significant difference between ACE and WER.
“But Wells et al. [2022] could not ind a signiicant diference between ACE and WER.”
From Measuring the Accuracy of Automatic Speech Recognition Solutions (2023) · cites this paper as Wells et al. 2022
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Measuring the Accuracy of Automatic Speech Recognition Solutions
Kuhn, K., Kersken, V., Reuter, B., Egger, N., & Zimmermann, G. (2023) · ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing · doi:10.1145/3636513 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
“But Wells et al. [2022] could not ind a signiicant diference between ACE and WER.”
Background
- Authors
- Wells, T., Christoffels, D., Vogler, C., & Kushalnagar, R.
- Affiliations
- Columbia University (US)
- Gallaudet University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Kushalnagar, Raja
- Venue
- Lecture Notes in Computer Science
- Publisher
- Springer International Publishing
- Published
- 2022
- Pages
- 522-528
- ISSN
- 0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
- 1611-3349
- OpenAlex
- W4285148224
- Cited by
- 8
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2
- FWCI
- 16.48
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Lecture notes in computer science (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Subtitles and Audiovisual Media
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Natural Language Processing Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Image and Video Quality Assessment
- Keywords
- word error rate, accessibility
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
