Cited by 36Ethics and Social Impacts of AIArtificial Intelligence in EducationOnline Learning and Analytics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

Experts’ View on Challenges and Needs for Fairness in Artificial Intelligence for Education

Open access
Fenu, Gianni, Galici, Roberta, Marras, Mirko·2022·Lecture Notes in Computer Science

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-031-11644-5_20

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 19 · Cited by 36

Research works printed but not linked: 16

  1. Abidi, S.M.R., Hussain, M., Xu, Y., Zhang, W.: Prediction of confusion attempting algebra homework in an intelligent tutoring system through machine learning techniques for educational sustainable development. Sustainability 11(1), 105 (2019) · DOI
  2. Abyaa, A., Khalidi Idrissi, M., Bennani, S.: Learner modelling: systematic review of the literature from the last 5 years. Educ. Tech. Res. Dev. 67(5), 1105–1143 (2019) · DOI
  3. Alameda-Pineda, X., Redi, M., Otterbacher, J., Sebe, N., Chang, S.F.: FATE/MM 20: 2nd international workshop on fairness, accountability, transparency and ethics in multimedia. In: Proceedings of the 28th ACM International Conference on Multimedia, pp. 4761–4762 (2020) · DOI
  4. Alboaneen, D., Almelihi, M., Alsubaie, R., Alghamdi, R., Alshehri, L., Alharthi, R.: Development of a web-based prediction system for students’ academic performance. Data 7(2), 21 (2022) · DOI
  5. Alsuliman, T., Humaidan, D., Sliman, L.: Ml and AI in the service of medicine: necessity or potentiality? Curr. Res. Transl. Med. 68(4), 245–251 (2020) · DOI
  6. Berendt, B., Littlejohn, A., Blakemore, M.: AI in education: learner choice and fundamental rights. Learn. Media Technol. 45(3), 312–324 (2020) · DOI · Paper page
  7. Britto, J., Prabhu, S., Gawali, A., Jadhav, Y.: A machine learning based approach for recommending courses at graduate level. In: 2019 International Conference on Smart Systems and Inventive Technology (ICSSIT), pp. 117–121. IEEE (2019) · DOI
  8. Caton, S., Haas, C.: Fairness in machine learning: a survey. arXiv preprint arXiv:2010.04053 (2020) · arXiv
  9. Hajian, S., Bonchi, F., Castillo, C.: Algorithmic bias: from discrimination discovery to fairness-aware data mining. In: Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pp. 2125–2126 (2016) · DOI · Paper page
  10. Holstein, K., Wortman Vaughan, J., Daumé III, H., Dudik, M., Wallach, H.: Improving fairness in machine learning systems: what do industry practitioners need? In: Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computer Systems, pp. 1–16 (2019) · DOI · Paper page
  11. Iosifidis, V., Fetahu, B., Ntoutsi, E.: FAE: a fairness-aware ensemble framework. In: 2019 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data), pp. 1375–1380. IEEE (2019) · DOI
  12. Liu, J., Eagan, J.: ADQDA: a cross-device affinity diagramming tool for fluid and holistic qualitative data analysis. Proc. ACM HC Interact. 5(ISS), 1–19 (2021) · DOI
  13. Mehrabi, N., Morstatter, F., Saxena, N., Lerman, K., Galstyan, A.: A survey on bias and fairness in ML. ACM Comp. Surv. (CSUR) 54(6), 1–35 (2021) · DOI · Paper page
  14. Rastrollo-Guerrero, J.L., Gomez-Pulido, J.A., Duran-Dom., A.: Analyzing and predicting students’ performance by means of ml: a review. Appl. Sci. 10(3), 1042 (2020) · DOI
  15. Shahbazi, Z., Byun, Y.C.: Toward social media content recommendation integrated with data science and ml approach for e-learners. Symmetry 12(11), 1798 (2020) · DOI
  16. Wang, J., Molina, M.D., Sundar, S.S.: When expert recommendation contradicts peer opinion: relative social influence of valence, group identity and artificial intelligence. Comput. Hum. Behav. 107, 106278 (2020) · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Fenu, G., Galici, R., & Marras, M.
Affiliations
University of Cagliari (IT)
Corresponding author
Galici, Roberta
Venue
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
Published
2022
Pages
243-255
ISSN
  • 0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
  • 1611-3349
OpenAlex
W4283830183
Cited by
36
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 1
FWCI
7.20
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Lecture notes in computer science (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • UNICA IRIS Institutional Research Information System (University of Cagliari) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Social Sciences › Education › Artificial Intelligence in Education
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Online Learning and Analytics
Keywords
algorithmic fairness, algorithmic bias, educational technology, expert opinion, learning data

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Experts’ View on Challenges and Needs for Fairness in Artificial Intelligence for Education. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/978-3-031-11644-5_20
The paper
Fenu, G., Galici, R., & Marras, M. (2022). Experts’ View on Challenges and Needs for Fairness in Artificial Intelligence for Education. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-11644-5_20