The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
Experts’ View on Challenges and Needs for Fairness in Artificial Intelligence for Education
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“This is because studies have demonstrated that creating fair and equitable assessments is one area that AI struggles with (Madaio et al., 2022;Yu, 2020;Fenu et al., 2022).”
From Higher Education's Generative Artificial Intelligence Paradox: The Meaning of Chatbot Mania (2024) · cites this paper as Fenu et al., 2022
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 19 · Cited by 36
Research works printed but not linked: 16
- Abidi, S.M.R., Hussain, M., Xu, Y., Zhang, W.: Prediction of confusion attempting algebra homework in an intelligent tutoring system through machine learning techniques for educational sustainable development. Sustainability 11(1), 105 (2019) · DOI
- Abyaa, A., Khalidi Idrissi, M., Bennani, S.: Learner modelling: systematic review of the literature from the last 5 years. Educ. Tech. Res. Dev. 67(5), 1105–1143 (2019) · DOI
- Alameda-Pineda, X., Redi, M., Otterbacher, J., Sebe, N., Chang, S.F.: FATE/MM 20: 2nd international workshop on fairness, accountability, transparency and ethics in multimedia. In: Proceedings of the 28th ACM International Conference on Multimedia, pp. 4761–4762 (2020) · DOI
- Alboaneen, D., Almelihi, M., Alsubaie, R., Alghamdi, R., Alshehri, L., Alharthi, R.: Development of a web-based prediction system for students’ academic performance. Data 7(2), 21 (2022) · DOI
- Alsuliman, T., Humaidan, D., Sliman, L.: Ml and AI in the service of medicine: necessity or potentiality? Curr. Res. Transl. Med. 68(4), 245–251 (2020) · DOI
- Berendt, B., Littlejohn, A., Blakemore, M.: AI in education: learner choice and fundamental rights. Learn. Media Technol. 45(3), 312–324 (2020) · DOI · Paper page
- Britto, J., Prabhu, S., Gawali, A., Jadhav, Y.: A machine learning based approach for recommending courses at graduate level. In: 2019 International Conference on Smart Systems and Inventive Technology (ICSSIT), pp. 117–121. IEEE (2019) · DOI
- Caton, S., Haas, C.: Fairness in machine learning: a survey. arXiv preprint arXiv:2010.04053 (2020) · arXiv
- Hajian, S., Bonchi, F., Castillo, C.: Algorithmic bias: from discrimination discovery to fairness-aware data mining. In: Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pp. 2125–2126 (2016) · DOI · Paper page
- Holstein, K., Wortman Vaughan, J., Daumé III, H., Dudik, M., Wallach, H.: Improving fairness in machine learning systems: what do industry practitioners need? In: Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computer Systems, pp. 1–16 (2019) · DOI · Paper page
- Iosifidis, V., Fetahu, B., Ntoutsi, E.: FAE: a fairness-aware ensemble framework. In: 2019 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data), pp. 1375–1380. IEEE (2019) · DOI
- Liu, J., Eagan, J.: ADQDA: a cross-device affinity diagramming tool for fluid and holistic qualitative data analysis. Proc. ACM HC Interact. 5(ISS), 1–19 (2021) · DOI
- Mehrabi, N., Morstatter, F., Saxena, N., Lerman, K., Galstyan, A.: A survey on bias and fairness in ML. ACM Comp. Surv. (CSUR) 54(6), 1–35 (2021) · DOI · Paper page
- Rastrollo-Guerrero, J.L., Gomez-Pulido, J.A., Duran-Dom., A.: Analyzing and predicting students’ performance by means of ml: a review. Appl. Sci. 10(3), 1042 (2020) · DOI
- Shahbazi, Z., Byun, Y.C.: Toward social media content recommendation integrated with data science and ml approach for e-learners. Symmetry 12(11), 1798 (2020) · DOI
- Wang, J., Molina, M.D., Sundar, S.S.: When expert recommendation contradicts peer opinion: relative social influence of valence, group identity and artificial intelligence. Comput. Hum. Behav. 107, 106278 (2020) · DOI
Metadata
- Authors
- Fenu, G., Galici, R., & Marras, M.
- Affiliations
- University of Cagliari (IT)
- Corresponding author
- Galici, Roberta
- Venue
- Lecture Notes in Computer Science
- Publisher
- Springer International Publishing
- Published
- 2022
- Pages
- 243-255
- ISSN
- 0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
- 1611-3349
- OpenAlex
- W4283830183
- Cited by
- 36
- References
- 19
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 1
- FWCI
- 7.20
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- Lecture notes in computer science (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- UNICA IRIS Institutional Research Information System (University of Cagliari) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
- Social Sciences › Education › Artificial Intelligence in Education
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Online Learning and Analytics
- Keywords
- algorithmic fairness, algorithmic bias, educational technology, expert opinion, learning data
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Experts’ View on Challenges and Needs for Fairness in Artificial Intelligence for Education. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/978-3-031-11644-5_20
- The paper
- Fenu, G., Galici, R., & Marras, M. (2022). Experts’ View on Challenges and Needs for Fairness in Artificial Intelligence for Education. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-11644-5_20