Cited by 6Hate Speech and Cyberbullying DetectionSpam and Phishing DetectionBullying, Victimization, and Aggression

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Kids Cybersecurity Using Computational Intelligence Techniques

Wael M. S. Yafooz, Hussain Al-Aqrabi, Arafat Al-Dhaqm, Abdel-Hamid Mohamed Emara·2023·Studies in Computational Intelligence

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-031-21199-7

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 6

Metadata

Authors
Yafooz, W. M. S., Al-Aqrabi, H., Al-Dhaqm, A., & Emara, A.-H. M.
Affiliations
  • Taibah University (SA)
  • University of Huddersfield (GB)
  • University of Technology Malaysia (MY)
Venue
Studies in Computational Intelligence
Published
2023
ISSN
  • 1860-949X (ISSN-L)
  • 1860-9503
OpenAlex
W4321442891
Cited by
6
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2023: 4
FWCI
1.06
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Studies in computational intelligence (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Spam and Phishing Detection
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
Keywords
cyberbullying detection, social media, child online safety, computational intelligence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review