Cited by 8Machine Learning and Data ClassificationAdversarial Robustness in Machine LearningAdvanced Neural Network Applications

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Learning from Noisy Labels with Coarse-to-Fine Sample Credibility Modeling

Open access

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-031-25063-7_2

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • For real videos, PhyStruct-Video relies on approximate geometry, materials and forces inferred from vision models and heuristics, which can introduce discrepancies between true and modeled dynamics.

    “For real videos, we rely on approximate geometry, materials and forces inferred from vision models and heuristics [38,39,40,51,53,54,56].This can introduce discrepancies between the true and modeled dynamics.”

    From PhyStruct-Video: Structured Physics State Spaces for Physically Consistent Video Generation (2025) · cites this paper as [40]

    The Introduction and Section 3.2 discuss learning from noisy labels and modeling sample credibility, not physical dynamics in real videos. Searches for approximate geometry, materials, forces, PhyStruct-Video, and discrepancies between true and modeled dynamics found no passage addressing the claim. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 55

  1. Arazo, E., Ortego, D., Albert, P., O’Connor, N.E., McGuinness, K.: Unsupervised label noise modeling and loss correction. In: Proc. International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML) (2019)
  2. Arpit, D., et al.: A closer look at memorization in deep networks. In: Proc. International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML), pp. 233–242 (2017)
  3. Berthelot, D., Carlini, N., Goodfellow, I.J., Papernot, N., Oliver, A., Raffel, C.: Mixmatch: a holistic approach to semi-supervised learning. Proc. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS) (2019)
  4. Chang, H.S., Learned-Miller, E., McCallum, A.: Active Bias: training more accurate neural networks by emphasizing high variance samples. In: Proc. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS), pp. 1002–1012 (2017)
  5. Dehghani, M., Severyn, A., Rothe, S., Kamps, J.: Avoiding your teacher’s mistakes: training neural networks with controlled weak supervision. (2017) arXiv preprint arXiv:1711.00313 · arXiv
  6. Dehghani, M., Severyn, A., Rothe, S., Kamps, J.: Learning to learn from weak supervision by full supervision. In: Proc. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems Workshop (NeurIPSW) (2017)
  7. Ghosh, A., Kumar, H., Sastry, P.: Robust loss functions under label noise for deep neural networks. In: Proc. Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AAAI) (2017) · DOI
  8. Goldberger, J., Ben-Reuven, E.: Training deep neural-networks using a noise adaptation layer. In: Proc. International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR) (2017)
  9. Han, B., et al.: Masking: A new perspective of noisy supervision. In: Proc. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS), pp. 5836–5846 (2018)
  10. Han, B., et al.: Co-teaching: robust training of deep neural networks with extremely noisy labels. In: Proc. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS), pp. 8527–8537 (2018)
  11. Han, J., Luo, P., Wang, X.: Deep self-learning from noisy labels. In: Proc. IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), pp. 5138–5147 (2019) · DOI
  12. Hendrycks, D., Mazeika, M., Wilson, D., Gimpel, K.: Using trusted data to train deep networks on labels corrupted by severe noise. In: Proc. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS), pp. 10456–10465 (2018)
  13. Houle, M.E.: Local intrinsic dimensionality I: an extreme-value-theoretic foundation for similarity applications. In: Proc. International Conference on Similarity Search and Applications (SISAP), pp. 64–79 (2017) · DOI
  14. Jiang, L., Zhou, Z., Leung, T., Li, L.J., Fei-Fei, L.: MentorNet: learning data-driven curriculum for very deep neural networks on corrupted labels. In: Proc. International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML) (2018)
  15. Li, J., Socher, R., Hoi, S.C.: Dividemix: learning with noisy labels as semi-supervised learning. (2020) arXiv preprint arXiv:2002.07394 · arXiv
  16. Li, J., Wong, Y., Zhao, Q., Kankanhalli, M.: learning to learn from noisy labeled data. In: Proc. IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pp. 5046–5054 (2019) · DOI
  17. Li, J., Xiong, C., Hoi, S.C.: Learning from noisy data with robust representation learning. In: Proc. IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), pp. 9485–9494 (2021) · DOI
  18. Li, X., Liu, T., Han, B., Niu, G., Sugiyama, M.: Provably end-to-end label-noise learning without anchor points. Proc. International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML) (2021)
  19. Li, Y., Yang, J., Song, Y., Cao, L., Luo, J., Li, L.J.: Learning from noisy labels with distillation. In: Proc. IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), pp. 1910–1918 (2017) · DOI
  20. Litany, O., Freedman, D.: Soseleto: a unified approach to transfer learning and training with noisy labels. (2018) arXiv preprint arXiv:1805.09622 · arXiv
  21. Liu, T., Tao, D.: Classification with noisy labels by importance reweighting. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. (TPAMI) 38(3), 447–461 (2015) · DOI
  22. Lyu, Y., Tsang, I.W.: Curriculum loss: robust learning and generalization against label corruption. In: Proc. International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR) (2020)
  23. Ma, X., et al.: Dimensionality-driven learning with noisy labels. In: Proc. International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML) (2018)
  24. Maas, A., Daly, R.E., Pham, P.T., Huang, D., Ng, A.Y., Potts, C.: Learning word vectors for sentiment analysis. In: Proceedings of the 49th annual meeting of the association for computational linguistics: human language technologies, pp. 142–150 (2011)
  25. Malach, E., Shalev-Shwartz, S.: Decoupling when to update from how to update. In: Proc. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS), pp. 960–970 (2017)
  26. Manning, C., Schutze, H.: Foundations of statistical natural language processing. MIT press (1999)
  27. Nguyen, D.T., Mummadi, C.K., Ngo, T.P.N., Nguyen, T.H.P., Beggel, L., Brox, T.: SELF: learning to filter noisy labels with self-Ensembling. In: Proc. International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR) (2020)
  28. Patrini, G., Rozza, A., Krishna Menon, A., Nock, R., Qu, L.: Making deep neural networks robust to label noise: a loss correction approach. In: Proc. IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pp. 1944–1952 (2017) · DOI
  29. Permuter, H., Francos, J.M., Jermyn, I.: A study of gaussian mixture models of color and texture features for image classification and segmentation. Pattern Recogn. (PR). 39, 695–706 (2006) · DOI
  30. Pleiss, G., Zhang, T., Elenberg, E.R., Weinberger, K.Q.: Identifying mislabeled data using the area under the margin ranking. In: Proc. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS) (2020)
  31. Reed, S., Lee, H., Anguelov, D., Szegedy, C., Erhan, D., Rabinovich, A.: Training deep neural networks on noisy labels with bootstrapping. In: Proc. International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR) (2015)
  32. Ren, M., Zeng, W., Yang, B., Urtasun, R.: Learning to reweight examples for robust deep learning. In: Proc. International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML) (2018)
  33. Shu, J., et al.: Meta-Weight-Net: learning an explicit mapping for sample weighting. In: Proc. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS), pp. 1917–1928 (2019)
  34. Song, H., Kim, M., Lee, J.G.: SELFIE: refurbishing unclean samples for robust deep learning. In: Proc. International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML), pp. 5907–5915 (2019)
  35. Tanaka, D., Ikami, D., Yamasaki, T., Aizawa, K.: Joint optimization framework for learning with noisy labels. In: Proc. IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pp. 5552–5560 (2018) · DOI
  36. Veit, A., Alldrin, N., Chechik, G., Krasin, I., Gupta, A., Belongie, S.: Learning from noisy large-scale datasets with minimal supervision. In: Proc. IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) (2017) · DOI
  37. Wang, R., Liu, T., Tao, D.: Multiclass learning with partially corrupted labels. IEEE Trans. Neural Networks. Learn. Syst. 29(6), 2568–2580 (2017) · DOI
  38. Wang, X., Hua, Y., Kodirov, E., Clifton, D.A., Robertson, N.M.: Proselflc: progressive self label correction for training robust deep neural networks. In: Proc. IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pp. 752–761 (2021) · DOI
  39. Wang, X., Hua, Y., Kodirov, E., Robertson, N.M.: Imae for noise-robust learning: mean absolute error does not treat examples equally and gradient magnitude’s variance matters. (2019) arXiv preprint arXiv:1903.12141 · arXiv
  40. Wang, X., Kodirov, E., Hua, Y., Robertson, N.M.: Derivative manipulation for general example weighting. (2019) arXiv preprint arXiv:1905.11233 · arXiv
  41. Wang, Y., Ma, X., Chen, Z., Luo, Y., Yi, J., Bailey, J.: Symmetric cross entropy for robust learning with noisy labels. In: Proc. IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), pp. 322–330 (2019) · DOI · Paper page
  42. Wei, H., Feng, L., Chen, X., An, B.: Combating noisy labels by agreement: a joint training method with co-regularization. In: Proc. IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pp. 13726–13735 (2020) · DOI
  43. Xiao, T., Xia, T., Yang, Y., Huang, C., Wang, X.: Learning from massive noisy labeled data for image classification. In: Proc. IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pp. 2691–2699 (2015)
  44. Yao, Q., Yang, H., Han, B., Niu, G., Kwok, J.: Searching to exploit memorization effect in learning with noisy labels. In: Proc. International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML) (2020)
  45. Yi, K., Wu, J.: Probabilistic end-to-end noise correction for learning with noisy labels. In: Proc. IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pp. 7017–7025 (2019) · DOI
  46. Yu, X., Han, B., Yao, J., Niu, G., Tsang, I.W., Sugiyama, M.: How does disagreement help generalization against label corruption? In: Proc. International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML) (2019)
  47. Zhang, C., Bengio, S., Hardt, M., Recht, B., Vinyals, O.: Understanding deep learning requires rethinking generalization. In: Proc. International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR) (2017)
  48. Zhang, H., Cissé, M., Dauphin, Y.N., Lopez-Paz, D.: mixup: Beyond empirical risk minimization. In: Proc. International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR) (2018)
  49. Zhang, M., Lee, J., Agarwal, S.: Learning from noisy labels with no change to the training process. In: Proc. International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML), pp. 12468–12478 (2021)
  50. Zhang, W., Wang, Y., Qiao, Y.: Metacleaner: Learning to hallucinate clean representations for noisy-labeled visual recognition. In: Proc. IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pp. 7365–7374 (2019) · DOI
  51. Zhang, Y., Zheng, S., Wu, P., Goswami, M., Chen, C.: Learning with feature-dependent label noise: a progressive approach. In: Proc. International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR) (2021)
  52. Zhang, Z., Sabuncu, M.: Generalized cross entropy loss for training deep neural networks with noisy labels. In: Proc. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS), pp. 8778–8788 (2018)
  53. Zhang, Z., Zhang, H., Arik, S.O., Lee, H., Pfister, T.: Distilling effective supervision from severe label noise. In: Proc. IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pp. 9294–9303 (2020) · DOI
  54. Zheltonozhskii, E., Baskin, C., Mendelson, A., Bronstein, A.M., Litany, O.: Contrast to divide: self-supervised pre-training for learning with noisy labels. (2021) arXiv preprint arXiv:2103.13646 · DOI
  55. Zhou, T., Wang, S., Bilmes, J.: Robust curriculum learning: From clean label detection to noisy label self-correction. In: Proc. International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR) (2021)

Metadata

Authors
Zhang, B., Li, Y., Tu, Y., Peng, J., Wang, Y., Wu, C., Xiao, Y., & Zhao, C.
Affiliations
  • Tongji University (CN)
  • Huazhong University of Science and Technology (CN)
Corresponding author
Wang, Yabiao
Venue
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
Published
2023
Pages
21-38
ISSN
  • 0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
  • 1611-3349
OpenAlex
W4320893587
Cited by
8
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2
FWCI
0.93
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Lecture notes in computer science (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning and Data Classification
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
Keywords
label noise, label noise robustness, label correction, semantic noise, image classification, text recognition

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review