Cited by 0Wikis in Education and Collaborationscientometrics and bibliometrics researchWeb visibility and informetrics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 21 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Time Lag Analysis of Adding Scholarly References to English Wikipedia: How Rapidly Are They Added to and How Fresh Are They?

Kikkawa, Jiro, Takaku, Masao, Yoshikane, Fuyuki·2023·Lecture Notes in Computer Science

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-031-28032-0_33

Cites

20 of 21 references verified1 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 19 references

Cited by

Still being checked.

Metadata

Authors
Kikkawa, J., Takaku, M., & Yoshikane, F.
Affiliations
University of Tsukuba (JP)
Corresponding author
Kikkawa, Jiro
Venue
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
Published
2023
Pages
425-438
ISSN
  • 0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
  • 1611-3349
OpenAlex
W4323780440
Cited by
0
References
19
FWCI
0.00
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Lecture notes in computer science (publishedVersion)
Funders
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (22K18147, 21K21303)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Wikis in Education and Collaboration
  • Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › scientometrics and bibliometrics research
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Web visibility and informetrics
Keywords
Wikipedia, citation lag, English Wikipedia, information quality, time series analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review