Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 16 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Other Side of Compression: Measuring Bias in Pruned Transformers

Open access
Proskurina, Irina, Metzler, Guillaume, Velcin, Julien·2023·Lecture Notes in Computer Science

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-031-30047-9_29

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 16 references

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. Hooker, S., Courville, A., Clark, G., Dauphin, Y., Frome, A.: What do compressed deep neural networks forget? arXiv preprint arXiv:1911.05248 (2019) · arXiv
  2. Liu, Y., et al.: Roberta: a robustly optimized BERT pretraining approach. CoRR abs/1907.11692 (2019). http://arxiv.org/abs/1907.11692 · arXiv
  3. Neill, J.O.: An overview of neural network compression. arXiv preprint arXiv:2006.03669 (2020) · arXiv
  4. Niu, J., Lu, W., Penn, G.: Does BERT rediscover a classical NLP pipeline? In: Proceedings of the 29th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, pp. 3143–3153 (2022)
  5. Sajjad, H., Dalvi, F., Durrani, N., Nakov, P.: Poor man’s BERT: smaller and faster transformer models. CoRR abs/2004.03844 (2020) · arXiv
  6. Sanh, V., Debut, L., Chaumond, J., Wolf, T.: DistilBERT, a distilled version of BERT: smaller, faster, cheaper and lighter. ArXiv abs/1910.01108 (2019) · arXiv
  7. Soares, I.B., Wei, D., Ramamurthy, K.N., Singh, M., Yurochkin, M.: Your fairness may vary: pretrained language model fairness in toxic text classification. In: Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (2022)
  8. Xu, J.M., Jun, K.S., Zhu, X., Bellmore, A.: Learning from bullying traces in social media. In: Proceedings of the 2012 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, pp. 656–666 (2012)

Cited by

See all 1

Metadata

Authors
Proskurina, I., Metzler, G., & Velcin, J.
Affiliations
Université Lumière Lyon 2 (FR)
Corresponding author
Proskurina, Irina
Venue
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
Published
2023
Volume
13876
Pages
366-378
ISSN
  • 0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
  • 1611-3349
OpenAlex
W4361982895
Cited by
1
References
16
Citations by year
2024: 1
FWCI
0.18
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Lecture notes in computer science (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-21-CE23-0026)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
Keywords
model compression, algorithmic bias, hate speech detection, offensive language classification, gender bias, racial bias, religious bias, attention mechanism, BERT, RoBERTa, social media text, Twitter, Gab

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Other Side of Compression: Measuring Bias in Pruned Transformers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/978-3-031-30047-9_29
The paper
Proskurina, I., Metzler, G., & Velcin, J. (2023). The Other Side of Compression: Measuring Bias in Pruned Transformers. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-30047-9_29

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.