Logic-Based Explainable and Incremental Machine Learning
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Recent advances in ILP, such as the FOLD family of algorithms, demonstrate that complex data can be represented in small logic programs using default rules.
“Recent advances in ILP, such as the FOLD family of algorithms, demonstrate that complex data can be represented in small logic programs using default rules.”
From Autonomous Task Completion Based on Goal-directed Answer Set Programming (2025) · cites this paper as [7]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Autonomous Task Completion Based on Goal-directed Answer Set Programming
Tudor, A. R. (2025) · Electronic Proceedings in Theoretical Computer Science · doi:10.4204/eptcs.416.39
- Authors
- Gupta, G., Wang, H., Basu, K., Shakerin, F., Salazar, E., Varanasi, S. C., Padalkar, P., & Dasgupta, S.
- Affiliations
- The University of Texas at Dallas (US)
- Corresponding author
- Gupta, Gopal
- ORCID
- Venue
- Lecture Notes in Computer Science
- Publisher
- Springer Nature Switzerland
- Published
- 2023
- Pages
- 346-358
- ISSN
- 0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
- 1611-3349
- OpenAlex
- W4380905532
- Cited by
- 4
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2
- FWCI
- 0.71
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Lecture notes in computer science (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Data Mining Algorithms and Applications
- Keywords
- explainable machine learning, logic programming, fold structures, rule-based machine learning, default rules, relational data, interpretability, theory revision, explanation-based learning, data economy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review