Work Characteristics as Determinants of Remote Working Acceptance: Integrating UTAUT and JD-R Models
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Techno-job resources are positively related to attitude towards remote working.
“Techno-job resources are negatively related to technojob demands and positively to attitude towards remote working”
From Leadership and technostress: A systematic literature review (2025) · cites this paper as Massa et al. (2023)
Techno-job resources are negatively related to techno-job demands.
“Techno-job resources are negatively related to technojob demands and positively to attitude towards remote working”
From Leadership and technostress: A systematic literature review (2025) · cites this paper as Massa et al. (2023)
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 56 · Cited by 10
- Authors
- Massa, N., Santarpia, F. P., & Consiglio, C.
- Affiliations
- Sapienza University of Rome (IT)
- Corresponding author
- Massa, Nicoletta
- Venue
- Lecture Notes in Computer Science
- Publisher
- Springer Nature Switzerland
- Published
- 2023
- Pages
- 163-180
- ISSN
- 0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
- 1611-3349
- OpenAlex
- W4383616961
- Cited by
- 10
- References
- 56
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2
- FWCI
- 5.00
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Lecture notes in computer science (publishedVersion)
- IRIS Research product catalog (Sapienza University of Rome) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Technostress in Professional Settings
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Work-Family Balance Challenges
- Keywords
- remote work, technology acceptance, UTAUT, job demands-resources model, technostress, technological complexity, techno-invasion, techno-overload, technical support
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review