The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
How to Ensure Web Accessibility in Digital Services to Improve the Competitive Advantage of an Organization
Open accessOverview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Conversely, embracing digital accessibility can enhance user experience, expand customer base, and foster innovation [6], [7].”
From Digital Accessibility in Higher Education: A Dutch case study (2024) · cites this paper as [7]
Citations
The citation lists are queued
They are fetched later and appear here then.
References 22 · Cited by 2
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Schmutz, S., Sonderegger, A., Sauer, J.: Implementing recommendations from web accessibility guidelines: a comparative study of nondisabled users and users with visual impairment. Hum. Factors 59(6), 956–972 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720817708 · doi:10.1177/0018720817708
Metadata
- Authors
- Kärpänen, T.
- Affiliations
- University of Helsinki (FI)
- Corresponding author
- Kärpänen, Terhi
- ORCID
- Kärpänen, Terhi
- Venue
- Lecture Notes in Computer Science
- Publisher
- Springer Nature Switzerland
- Published
- 2023
- Pages
- 74-87
- ISSN
- 0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
- 1611-3349
- OpenAlex
- W4383616656
- Cited by
- 2
- References
- 22
- Citations by year
- 2024: 2
- FWCI
- 0.84
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hdl.handle.net
- Licence
- other-oa
- www.springernature.com/gp/researchers/text-and-data-mining (tdm)
- www.springernature.com/gp/researchers/text-and-data-mining (vor)
- Locations
- Lecture notes in computer science (publishedVersion)
- Työväentutkimus Vuosikirja (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Digital Accessibility for Disabilities
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Usability and User Interface Design
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information Architecture and Usability
- Keywords
- web accessibility, digital services, competitive advantage, usability, cognitive accessibility, digitalization, inclusive design, accessible content
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: How to Ensure Web Accessibility in Digital Services to Improve the Competitive Advantage of an Organization. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/978-3-031-35681-0_5
- The paper
- Kärpänen, T. (2023). How to Ensure Web Accessibility in Digital Services to Improve the Competitive Advantage of an Organization. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-35681-0_5
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
