Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 5

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Software Heritage Open Science Ecosystem

Cosmo, Roberto Di, Zacchiroli, Stefano·2023·Software Ecosystems
DOI 10.1007/978-3-031-36060-2_2
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Software Heritage is the largest public archive of software source code and associated development history, as captured by modern version control systems. As of July 2023, it has archived more than 16 billion unique source code files coming from more than 250 million collaborative development projects. In this chapter, we describe the Software Heritage ecosystem, focusing on research and open science use cases. On the one hand, Software Heritage supports empirical research on software by materializing in a single Merkle direct acyclic graph the development history of public code. This giant graph of source code artifacts (files, directories, and commits) can be used –and has been used– to study repository forks, open source contributors, vulnerability propagation, software provenance tracking, source code indexing, and more. On the other hand, Software Heritage ensures availability and guarantees integrity of the source code of software artifacts used in any field that relies on software to conduct experiments, contributing to making research reproducible. The source code used in scientific experiments can be archived –e.g., via integration with open-access repositories – referenced using persistent identifiers that allow downstream integrity checks and linked to/from other scholarly digital artifacts.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-031-36060-2_2

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 38

  1. Abramatic, J.F., Di Cosmo, R., Zacchiroli, S.: Building the universal archive of source code. Commun. ACM 61(10), 29–31 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1145/3183558 · DOI
  2. Allançon, T., Pietri, A., Zacchiroli, S.: The software heritage filesystem (SwhFS): integrating source code archival with development. In: International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE). IEEE, Piscataway (2021). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSE-Companion52605.2021.00032 · DOI
  3. Allen, A., Schmidt, J.: Looking before leaping: creating a software registry. J. Open Res. Softw. 3(e15) (2015). https://doi.org/10.5334/jors.bv · DOI
  4. Alliez, P., Di Cosmo, R., Guedj, B., Girault, A., Hacid, M.S., Legrand, A., Rougier, N.: Attributing and referencing (research) software: best practices and outlook from INRIA. Comput. Sci. Eng. 22(1), 39–52 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1109/MCSE.2019.2949413. Available from https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02135891 · DOI
  5. Berners-Lee, T., Fielding, R., Masinter, L.: Uniform resource identifier (URI): Generic syntax. RFC 3986, RFC Editor (2005) · DOI
  6. Bhattacharjee, A., Nath, S.S., Zhou, S., Chakroborti, D., Roy, B., Roy, C.K., Schneider, K.A.: An exploratory study to find motives behind cross-platform forks from software heritage dataset. In: International Conference on Mining Software Repositories (MSR), pp. 11–15. ACM, New York (2020). https://doi.org/10.1145/3379597.3387512 · DOI
  7. Boldi, P., Pietri, A., Vigna, S., Zacchiroli, S.: Ultra-large-scale repository analysis via graph compression. In: International Conference on Software Analysis, Evolution and Reengineering (SANER), pp. 184–194. IEEE, Piscataway (2020). https://doi.org/10.1109/SANER48275.2020.9054827 · DOI
  8. Bönisch, S., Brickenstein, M., Chrapary, H., Greuel, G., Sperber, W.: swMATH - a new information service for mathematical software. In: MKM/Calculemus/DML. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 7961, pp. 369–373. Springer, Berlin (2013) · DOI
  9. Borgman, C.L., Wallis, J.C., Mayernik, M.S.: Who’s got the data? Interdependencies in science and technology collaborations. In: Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), vol. 21, pp. 485–523 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10606-012-9169-z · DOI
  10. Childers, B.R., Fursin, G., Krishnamurthi, S., Zeller, A.: Artifact evaluation for publications (Dagstuhl Perspectives Workshop 15452). Dagstuhl Rep. 5(11), 29–35 (2016). https://doi.org/10.4230/DagRep.5.11.29 · DOI
  11. Di Cosmo, R.: Archiving and referencing source code with software heritage. In: International Conference on Mathematical Software (ICMS). Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 12097, pp. 362–373. Springer, Berlin (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52200-1_36 · DOI
  12. Di Cosmo, R., Zacchiroli, S.: Software Heritage: Why and how to preserve software source code. In: International Conference on Digital Preservation (iPRES) (2017)
  13. Di Cosmo, R., Gruenpeter, M., Zacchiroli, S.: Identifiers for digital objects: the case of software source code preservation. In: International Conference on Digital Preservation (iPRES) (2018). https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/KDE56 · DOI
  14. Di Cosmo, R., Gruenpeter, M., Marmol, B.P., Monteil, A., Romary, L., Sadowska, J.: Curated Archiving of Research Software Artifacts: lessons learned from the French open archive (HAL) (2019). Presented at the International Digital Curation Conference. Submitted to IJDC · DOI
  15. Di Cosmo, R., Gruenpeter, M., Zacchiroli, S.: Referencing source code artifacts: a separate concern in software citation. Comput. Sci. Eng. 22(2), 33–43 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1109/MCSE.2019.2963148 · DOI
  16. Di Cosmo, R., Lopez, J.B.G., Abramatic, J.F., Graf, K., Colom, M., Manghi, P., Harrison, M., Barborini, Y., Tenhunen, V., Wagner, M., Dalitz, W., Maassen, J., Martinez-Ortiz, C., Ronchieri, E., Yates, S., Schubotz, M., Candela, L., Fenner, M., Jeangirard, E.: Scholarly Infrastructures for Research Software. European Commission. Directorate General for Research and Innovation (2020). https://doi.org/10.2777/28598 · DOI
  17. Dyer, R., Nguyen, H.A., Rajan, H., Nguyen, T.N.: Boa: a language and infrastructure for analyzing ultra-large-scale software repositories. In: International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE), pp. 422–431 (2013) · DOI
  18. Heckman, J.: Varieties of selection bias. Am Eco Rev 80(2), 313–318 (1990)
  19. Hinsen, K.: Software development for reproducible research. Comput. Sci. Eng. 15(4), 60–63 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1109/MCSE.2013.91 · DOI
  20. Howison, J., Bullard, J.: Software in the scientific literature: problems with seeing, finding, and using software mentioned in the biology literature. J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 67(9), 2137–2155 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23538 · DOI
  21. Hunter, J.D.: Matplotlib: A 2D graphics environment. Comput. Sci. Eng. 9(3), 90–95 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1109/MCSE.2007.55 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Ivie, P., Thain, D.: Reproducibility in scientific computing. ACM Comput. Surv. 51(3), 63:1–63:36 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1145/3186266 · DOI
  23. Lamprecht, A.L., Garcia, L., Kuzak, M., Martinez, C., Arcila, R., Martin Del Pico, E., Dominguez Del Angel, V., van de Sandt, S., Ison, J., Martinez, P.A., McQuilton, P., Valencia, A., Harrow, J., Psomopoulos, F., Gelpi, J.L., Chue Hong, N., Goble, C., Capella-Gutierrez, S.: Towards FAIR principles for research software. Data Sci. 3(1), 37–59 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3233/DS-190026 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Ma, Y., Bogart, C., Amreen, S., Zaretzki, R., Mockus, A.: World of code: an infrastructure for mining the universe of open source VCS data. In: International Conference on Mining Software Repositories (MSR), pp. 143–154. IEEE, Piscataway (2019). https://doi.org/10.1109/MSR.2019.00031 · DOI
  25. Messerschmitt, D.G., Szyperski, C.: Software Ecosystem: Understanding an Indispensable Technology and Industry. MIT Press, Cambridge (2003) · DOI
  26. Mockus, A.: Amassing and indexing a large sample of version control systems: towards the census of public source code history. In: International Working Conference on Mining Software Repositories (MSR), pp. 11–20. IEEE, Piscataway (2009). https://doi.org/10.1109/MSR.2009.5069476 · DOI
  27. Pietri, A.: Organizing the graph of public software development for large-scale mining. (organisation du graphe de développement logiciel pour l’analyse à grande échelle). Ph.D. Thesis, University of Paris (2021)
  28. Pietri, A., Spinellis, D., Zacchiroli, S.: The Software Heritage graph dataset: public software development under one roof. In: International Conference on Mining Software Repositories (MSR), pp. 138–142 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1109/MSR.2019.00030 · DOI
  29. Quinlan, S., Dorward, S.: Venti: a new approach to archival data storage. In: Conference on File and Storage Technologies (FAST). USENIX Association, Berkeley (2002). https://www.usenix.org/conference/fast-02/venti-new-approach-archival-data-storage
  30. Rossi, D., Zacchiroli, S.: Geographic diversity in public code contributions: an exploratory large-scale study over 50 years. In: International Conference on Mining Software Repositories (MSR), pp. 80–85. ACM, New York (2022). https://doi.org/10.1145/3524842.3528471 · DOI
  31. Rossi, D., Zacchiroli, S.: Worldwide gender differences in public code contributions (and how they have been affected by the COVID-19 pandemic). In: International Conference on Software Engineering – Software Engineering in Society Track (ICSE-SEIS), pp. 172–183. ACM, New York (2022). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSE-SEIS55304.2022.9794118 · DOI
  32. Rousseau, G., Di Cosmo, R., Zacchiroli, S.: Software provenance tracking at the scale of public source code. Empirical Software Eng. 25(4), 2930–2959 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10664-020-09828-5 · DOI · Paper page
  33. Smith, A.M., Katz, D.S., Niemeyer, K.E.: Software citation principles. PeerJ Comput. Sci. 2, e86 (2016). https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.86 · DOI
  34. Stewart, K., Odence, P., Rockett, E.: Software package data exchange (SPDX) specification. IFOSS L. Rev. 2, 191 (2010) · DOI
  35. Stodden, V., LeVeque, R.J., Mitchell, I.: Reproducible research for scientific computing: tools and strategies for changing the culture. Comput. Sci. Eng. 14(4), 13–17 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1109/MCSE.2012.38 · DOI
  36. Wellenzohn, K., Böhlen, M.H., Helmer, S., Pietri, A., Zacchiroli, S.: Robust and scalable content-and-structure indexing. VLDB J. (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00778-022-00764-y · DOI
  37. Zacchiroli, S.: Gender differences in public code contributions: a 50-year perspective. IEEE Softw. 38(2), 45–50 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1109/MS.2020.3038765 · DOI
  38. Zacchiroli, S.: A large-scale dataset of (open source) license text variants. In: International Conference on Mining Software Repositories (MSR), pp. 757–761. ACM, New York (2022). https://doi.org/10.1145/3524842.3528491 · DOI · Paper page

Metadata

Authors
Cosmo, R. D., & Zacchiroli, S.
Venue
Software Ecosystems
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published
2023
Pages
33-61
DOI
10.1007/978-3-031-36060-2_2
Cited by
5
References
2
Language
en
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.