CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 35Academic integrity and plagiarismEthics in Business and EducationAcademic Freedom and Politics

Second Handbook of Academic Integrity

Sarah Elaine Eaton·2024·Springer International Handbooks of Education
DOI 10.1007/978-3-031-39989-3
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-031-54144-5

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Education scholars have advocated for teaching academic honesty as an ongoing skill that students develop throughout their academic journeys.

    “Education scholars have advocated for teaching academic honesty as an ongoing skill that students develop throughout their academic journeys (Eaton, 2023).”

    From Evolving intersections: AI, disability, and academic integrity in higher education (2025) · cites this paper as Eaton, 2023

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Eaton, S. E.
Affiliations
University of Calgary (CA)
Corresponding author
Sarah Elaine Eaton
ORCID
Sarah Elaine Eaton
Venue
Springer International Handbooks of Education
Publisher
Springer Nature Switzerland
Published
2024
ISSN
  • 2197-1951
  • 2197-196X
DOI
10.1007/978-3-031-39989-3
OpenAlex
W4389316797
Cited by
35
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 7 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1
Type
reference entry
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
Locations
Springer eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Academic integrity and plagiarism
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Ethics in Business and Education
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Academic Freedom and Politics
Keywords
academic integrity, academic ethics, higher education, research integrity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review