Visual Grounding of Whole Radiology Reports for 3D CT Images
Open accessIntegrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
RadFact-Llama3 shows high alignment with the errors spotted by radiologists in the ReXVal dataset.
“RadFact-Llama3 shows high alignment with the errors spotted by radiologists in the ReXVal dataset.47”
From MAIRA-2: Grounded Radiology Report Generation (2024) · cites this paper as [47]
Cites
Stacked Cross Attention for Image-Text Matching
Lee, K.-H., Chen, X., Hua, G., Hu, H., & He, X. (2018) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-01225-0_13 · Cited by 1,402 · see citing works
Yan, K., Wang, X., Lu, L., & Summers, R. M. (2018) · Journal of medical imaging · doi:10.1117/1.jmi.5.3.036501 · Cited by 573 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
MAIRA-2: Grounded Radiology Report Generation
Bannur, S., Bouzid, K., Castro, D. C., Schwaighofer, A., Thieme, A., Bond-Taylor, S., Ilse, M., Pérez-García, F., Salvatelli, V., Sharma, H., et al. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2406.04449 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
“Grounded reporting differs from the existing task of medical phrase grounding (MPG) (Müller et al., 2024; Ichinose et al., 2023; Zou et al., 2024; Boecking et al., 2022) in that MPG aims to ground a specified finding or phrase, typically assumed present within the image.”
Method
- Authors
- Ichinose, A., Hatsutani, T., Nakamura, K., Kitamura, Y., Iizuka, S., Simo-Serra, E., Kido, S., & Tomiyama, N.
- Affiliations
- Fujifilm (Japan) (JP)
- University of Tsukuba (JP)
- The University of Osaka (JP)
- Corresponding author
- Ichinose, Akimichi
- Venue
- Lecture Notes in Computer Science
- Publisher
- Springer Nature Switzerland
- Published
- 2023
- Pages
- 611-621
- ISSN
- 0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
- 1611-3349
- OpenAlex
- W4387211952
- Cited by
- 6
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1
- FWCI
- 0.64
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Lecture notes in computer science (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Medical Image Segmentation Techniques
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
- Keywords
- visual grounding, radiology reports, CT images, medical image annotation, anatomical segmentation, anomaly localization
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review