CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 10

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Mental Health and Virtual Companions: The Example of Replika

Goodings, Lewis, Ellis, Darren, Tucker, Ian·2024·Palgrave Studies in Cyberpsychology
DOI 10.1007/978-3-031-53911-4_3
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-031-53911-4_3

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 9 references

Research works printed but not linked: 19

  1. Adams, N. N. (2022). ‘Scraping’ Reddit posts for academic research? Addressing some blurred lines of consent in growing internet-based research trend during the time of Covid-19. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 27(1) 47–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2022.2111816 · DOI
  2. Bosch, M., Fernandez-Borsot, G., Comas, M. I., & Figa Vaello, J. (2022). Evolving friendship? Essential changes, from social networks to artificial companions. Social Network Analysis and Mining, 12(1), 1–10. · DOI
  3. Brandtzaeg, P. B., Skjuve, M., & Følstad, A. (2022). My AI friend: How users of a social chatbot understand their human–AI friendship. Human Communication Research, 48(3), 404–429. · DOI · Paper page
  4. De Nieva, J. O., Joaquin, J. A., Tan, C. B., Marc Te, R. K., & Ong, E. (2020, October). Investigating students’ use of a mental health chatbot to alleviate academic stress. In 6th International ACM In-Cooperation HCI and UX Conference (pp. 1–10). · DOI
  5. Ellis, D., & Cromby, J. (2011). Emotional inhibition: A discourse analysis of disclosure. Psychology & Health. http://www.informaworld.com/10.1080/08870446.2011.584623 · DOI
  6. Ellis, D., & Tucker, I. (2015). Social psychology of emotion. Sage Publications. · DOI
  7. Eriksson, T. (2022). Design fiction exploration of romantic interaction with virtual humans in virtual reality. Journal of Future Robot Life, 3(1), 63–75. · DOI
  8. Fan, R., Varamesh, A., Varol, O., Barron, A., van de Leemput, I., Scheffer, M., & Bollen, J. (2018). Does putting your emotions into words make you feel better? Measuring the minute-scale dynamics of emotions from online data. arXiv preprint arXiv:1807.09725. · arXiv
  9. García, E. (2023). Affective atmospheres and the enactive-ecological framework. Philosophical Psychology, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/09515089.2023.2229350 · DOI
  10. Indrayani, L. M., Amalia, R. M., & Hakim, F. Z. M. (2020). Emotive expressions on social chatbot. Jurnal Sosioteknologi, 18(3), 509–516. · DOI
  11. Khadpe, P., Krishna, R., Fei-Fei, L., Hancock, J. T., & Bernstein, M. S. (2020). Conceptual metaphors impact perceptions of human-AI collaboration. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 4(CSCW2), 1–26. · DOI · Paper page
  12. Mayer, J. D., & Salovey, P. (1995). Emotional intelligence and the construction and regulation of feelings. Applied and Preventive Psychology, 4(3), 197–208. · DOI
  13. Mensio, M., Rizzo, G., & Morisio, M. (2018). The rise of emotion-aware conversational agents: threats in digital emotions. In Companion Proceedings of the The Web Conference 2018 (pp. 1541–1544). https://doi.org/10.1145/3184558.3191607 · DOI
  14. Pink, S., & Leder Mackley, K. (2013). Saturated and situated: Expanding the meaning of media in the routines of everyday life. Media, Culture & Society, 35(6), 677–691. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443713491298 · DOI
  15. Sulaiman, S., Mansor, M., Wahid, R. A., & Azhar, N. A. A. N. (2022). Anxiety assistance mobile apps chatbot using cognitive behavioural therapy. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence, 9(1), 17–23. · DOI
  16. Trothen, T. J. (2022). Replika: Spiritual enhancement technology? Religions, 13(4), 275. · DOI
  17. Weizenbaum, J. (1976). Computer power and human reason: From judgment to calculation. W. H. Freeman & Co.
  18. Wibhowo, C., & Sanjaya, R. (2021). Virtual assistant to suicide prevention in individuals with borderline personality disorder. In 2021 International Conference on Computer & Information Sciences (ICCOINS) (pp. 234–237). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCOINS49721.2021.9497160 · DOI
  19. Ziemer, K. S., & Korkmaz, G. (2017). Using text to predict psychological and physical health: A comparison of human raters and computerized text analysis. Computers in Human Behaviour, 76, 122–127. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 10

Metadata

Authors
Goodings, L., Ellis, D., & Tucker, I.
Venue
Palgrave Studies in Cyberpsychology
Publisher
Springer Nature Switzerland
Published
2024
Pages
43-58
ISSN
  • 2946-2754
  • 2946-2762
DOI
10.1007/978-3-031-53911-4_3
Cited by
10
References
9
Language
en
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review