Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

International Efforts Aimed at Promoting AI Transparency and/or Accountability

García, Jesús Javier Sánchez, Rivera, Nadia Elsa Gervacio, Iserte, Jonathan Mendoza·2025·Data Science, Machine Intelligence, and Law

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-032-02762-7_20

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

The publisher hasn’t deposited this paper’s reference list.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Cox, Robert W. Multilateralism and World Order. In: Cox, R. W.; Sassen, T. S. (eds.). Approaches to World Order. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
García, J. J. S., Rivera, N. E. G., & Iserte, J. M.
Corresponding author
Iserte, Jonathan Mendoza
Venue
Data Science, Machine Intelligence, and Law
Published
2025
Pages
303-314
ISSN
  • 2730-5899 (ISSN-L)
  • 2730-5902
OpenAlex
W7117976481
Cited by
0
References
0
FWCI
0.00
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
Locations
Data science, machine intelligence, and law (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Law › Digitalization, Law, and Regulation
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Social Sciences › Law › Artificial Intelligence in Law
Keywords
AI regulation, AI transparency, AI accountability, responsible AI governance, ethical AI, international cooperation on AI, Organization of American States, multi-stakeholder collaboration, trustworthy AI

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: International Efforts Aimed at Promoting AI Transparency and/or Accountability. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/978-3-032-02762-7_20
The paper
García, J. J. S., Rivera, N. E. G., & Iserte, J. M. (2025). International Efforts Aimed at Promoting AI Transparency and/or Accountability. Data Science, Machine Intelligence, and Law. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-032-02762-7_20

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.