Cited by 185Barrier Structure and Function StudiesIntracerebral and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage ResearchTraumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances

Blood-brain barrier function in intracerebral hemorrhage

Keep, R. F., Xiang, J., Ennis, S. R., Andjelkovic, A., Hua, Y., Xi, G., Hoff, J. T.·2009·Acta Neurochirurgica Supplementum

Abstract

In this paper, we review current knowledge on blood-brain barrier (BBB) dysfunction following intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). BBB disruption is a hallmark of ICH-induced brain injury. Such disruption contributes to edema formation, the influx of leukocytes, and the entry of potentially neuroactive agents into the perihematomal brain, all of which may contribute to brain injury. A range of factors have been implicated in inducing BBB disruption, including inflammatory mediators (e.g., cytokines and chemokines), thrombin, hemoglobin breakdown products, oxidative stress, complement, and matrix metalloproteinases. While there is interaction between some of these mediators, it is probable that prevention of ICH-induced BBB disruption will involve blocking multiple pathways or blocking a common end pathway (e.g., by stabilizing tight junction structure). While the effects of ICH on BBB passive permeability have been extensively examined, effects on other 'barrier' properties (metabolic and transport functions) have been less well-studied. However, recent data suggests that ICH can affect transport and that this may help protect the BBB and the brain. Indeed, it is possible in small bleeds that BBB disruption may be beneficial, and it is only in the presence of larger bleeds that disruption has detrimental effects.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-211-09469-3_15

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Blood-brain barrier dysfunction is a prominent pathological feature of both ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke and is typically associated with poor outcome.

    “BBB dysfunction is a prominent pathological feature of both ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke and is typically associated with poor outcome (307, 312, 482).”

    From Blood-Brain Barrier: From Physiology to Disease and Back (2019) · cites this paper as [307]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Keep, R. F., Xiang, J., Ennis, S. R., Andjelkovic, A., Hua, Y., Xi, G., & Hoff, J. T.
Affiliations
University of Michigan (US)
Venue
Acta Neurochirurgica Supplementum
Published
2009-02-26
Volume
105
Pages
73-77
ISSN
0065-1419 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W163988335
Cited by
185
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 9
FWCI
26.32
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Acta neurochirurgica. Supplementum (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NS-39866, NS 017760, R01NS039866, R01NS034709, NS-52510, U01NS052510, NS34709, R01NS017760)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Barrier Structure and Function Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Intracerebral and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
Keywords
blood-brain barrier dysfunction, intracerebral hemorrhage, cerebral edema, leukocyte influx, inflammatory mediators, cytokines, chemokines, thrombin, oxidative stress, complement system, matrix metalloproteinases, tight junctions, hemorrhagic stroke
MeSH terms
Animals, Blood-Brain Barrier, Cerebral Hemorrhage, Humans

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review