Barriers to ITS Adoption: A Systematic Mapping Study
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
AIEd systems rarely support flexible customization options to help teachers adapt these systems to the needs of their local contexts.
“AIEd systems rarely support flexible customization options, to help teachers adapt these systems to the needs of their local contexts (Nye, 2014).”
From Equity and Artificial Intelligence in Education: Will "AIEd" Amplify or Alleviate Inequities in Education? (2021) · cites this paper as Nye, 2014
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 26 · Cited by 20
- Authors
- Nye, B. D.
- Affiliations
- University of Memphis (US)
- Corresponding author
- Nye, Benjamin D.
- ORCID
- Nye, Benjamin D.
- Venue
- Lecture Notes in Computer Science
- Publisher
- Springer International Publishing
- Published
- 2014
- Pages
- 583-590
- ISSN
- 0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
- 1611-3349
- OpenAlex
- W110184136
- Cited by
- 20
- References
- 26
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2015: 2
- FWCI
- 0.79
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Lecture notes in computer science (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Artificial Intelligence in Education
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Educational Technology and E-Learning
- Keywords
- intelligent tutoring systems, technology adoption barriers, educational technology adoption, teacher adoption, developing countries
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
