Broadening the TP Profile: Future Negative Time Perspective
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Future negative time perspectives are significantly associated with anxiety.
“Studies have shown that future negative time perspectives are significantly associated with anxiety [11, 12]”
From Adaptive function and correlates of anxiety during a pandemic (2021) · cites this paper as [12]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 56 · Cited by 46
- Authors
- Carelli, M. G., Wiberg, B., & Åström, E.
- Affiliations
- Umeå University (SE)
- Corresponding author
- Carelli, Maria Grazia
- Venue
- Time Perspective Theory; Review, Research and Application
- Publisher
- Springer International Publishing
- Published
- 2014-10-16
- Pages
- 87-97
- OpenAlex
- W8718251
- Cited by
- 46
- References
- 56
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 6.82
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Springer eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Psychological and Temporal Perspectives Research
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Identity, Memory, and Therapy
- Keywords
- time perspective, future time perspective, subjective well-being, psychological adjustment, anxiety, uncertainty, goal setting
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
