Applying the User Experience Questionnaire (UEQ) in Different Evaluation Scenarios
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The User Experience Questionnaire (UEQ) has been proven effective for assessing usability across various software products.
“Additionally, the system is evaluated using both functional testing (Black Box) and the User Experience Questionnaire (UEQ), which has been proven effective for assessing usability across various software products (Schrepp et al., 2014).”
From Development of a Web-Based Information System for Smartphone Repair Services at OSDIG Store Using the Waterfall Method (2025) · cites this paper as Schrepp et al., 2014
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Design and evaluation of a short version of the User Experience Questionnaire (UEQ-S)
Schrepp, M., Hinderks, A., & Thomaschewski, J. (2017) · International Journal of Interactive Multimedia and Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.9781/ijimai.2017.09.001 · Cited by 1,058 · see citing works
Self-citationReview of Quantitative Empirical Evaluations of Technology for People with Visual Impairments
Brulé, E., Tomlinson, B. J., Metatla, O., Jouffrais, C., & Serrano, M. (2020) · Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3313831.3376749 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
te Pas, M. E., Rutten, W. G. M. M., Bouwman, R. A., & Buise, M. P. (2020) · JMIR Medical Informatics · doi:10.2196/21982 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
Hartmuth, D., Amin, R. M., Schlichting, D., Schött, S., Haudenschild, J., Küchenhoff, H., & Neuhaus, B. J. (2025) · Cogent Education · doi:10.1080/2331186x.2025.2470563 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Collaborative System Usability in Spaceflight Analog Environments Through Remote Observations
Shelat, S., Marquez, J. J., Zheng, J., & Karasinski, J. A. (2024) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app14052005 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Mingxuan, W., Ting, H., Chenqi, Z., Ningning, Z., Hao, C., Hongtao, Z., Shuo, L., & Yang, G. (2024) · Games for Health Journal · doi:10.1089/g4h.2024.0041 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Umar, R., & Ahnafi, M. G. (2025) · Innovation, Technology, and Entrepreneurship Journal · doi:10.31603/itej.13957 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
- Authors
- Schrepp, M., Hinderks, A., & Thomaschewski, J.
- Affiliations
- Systems, Applications & Products in Data Processing (Germany) (DE)
- University of Applied Sciences Emden Leer (DE)
- Venue
- Lecture Notes in Computer Science
- Publisher
- Springer International Publishing
- Published
- 2014
- Pages
- 383-392
- ISSN
- 0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
- 1611-3349
- OpenAlex
- W2175992854
- Cited by
- 560
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 51 · 2025: 111 · 2024: 81 · 2023: 84 · 2022: 74 · 2021: 47 · 2020: 43 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 9 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 6.17
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Lecture notes in computer science (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Usability and User Interface Design
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Interactive and Immersive Displays
- Keywords
- User Experience Questionnaire, user experience evaluation, questionnaire design, evaluation questions, interactive products, usability evaluation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
