Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 49Usability and User Interface DesignMobile and Web ApplicationsInnovative Human-Technology Interaction

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Towards the Development of Usability Heuristics for Native Smartphone Mobile Applications

Joyce, Ger, Lilley, Mariana·2014·Lecture Notes in Computer Science
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-07668-3_45
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-319-07668-3_45

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 12 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Rogers, Y., Sharp, H., Preece, J.: Interaction Design: Beyond Human - Computer Interaction. John Wiley & Sons (2011)
  2. Ketola, P., Röykkee, M.: The three facets of usability in mobile handsets. In: CHI 2001 Workshop: Mobile Communications: Understanding Users, Adoption & Design (2001)

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Joyce, G., & Lilley, M.
Affiliations
University of Hertfordshire (GB)
ORCID
Lilley, Mariana
Venue
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published
2014
Pages
465-474
ISSN
  • 0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
  • 1611-3349
DOI
10.1007/978-3-319-07668-3_45
OpenAlex
W1907860790
Cited by
49
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 1
FWCI
3.86
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
Locations
Lecture notes in computer science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Usability and User Interface Design
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Mobile and Web Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
Keywords
usability heuristics, heuristic evaluation, software usability, expert feedback, usability evaluation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.