The DOI matches its Crossref record; 85 of the 85 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Requirements Engineering: Best Practice
Open accessOverview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The integration of multiple stakeholders in requirements engineering (for an overview, see [28]) are therefore increasingly required by ethics codes as well as laws.”
From AI for the Common Good?! Pitfalls, challenges, and ethics pen-testing (2019) · cites this paper as [28]
Citations
Cites
A Simple Sequentially Rejective Multiple Test Procedure
(1979) · Scandinavian Journal of Statistics · doi:10.2307/4615733 · Cited by 21,526
On Non-Functional Requirements in Software Engineering
Chung, L., & do Prado Leite, J. C. S. (2009) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-02463-4_19 · Cited by 2,247
Experimentation in Software Engineering: An Introduction
Wohlin, C., Runeson, P., Höst, M., Ohlsson, M. C., Regnell, B., & Wesslén, A. (2011) · Lund University Publications (Lund University) · Cited by 2,214
Experimentation in Software Engineering
Wohlin, C., Runeson, P., Höst, M., Ohlsson, M. C., Regnell, B., & Wesslén, A. (2000) · Kluwer international series in software engineering · doi:10.1007/978-1-4615-4625-2 · Cited by 1,775
Designing and Conducting Survey Research: A Comprehensive Guide
Rea, L. M., & Parker, R. (1992) · Cited by 1,761
Goal-oriented requirements engineering: a guided tour
van Lamsweerde, A. (2002) · IEEE International Requirements Engineering Conference (RE) · doi:10.1109/isre.2001.948567 · Cited by 1,723
Non-Functional Requirements in Software Engineering
Chung, L., Nixon, B. A., Yu, E., & Mylopoulos, J. (2000) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4615-5269-7 · Cited by 1,692
Structured Analysis and System Specification
DeMarco, T. (2002) · Software Pioneers · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-59412-0_33 · Cited by 1,449
Cockburn, A. (2000) · Cited by 1,409
Technology roadmapping—A planning framework for evolution and revolution
Phaal, R., Farrukh, C. J. P., & Probert, D. R. (2004) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/s0040-1625(03)00072-6 · Cited by 1,229
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- Glinz M, Fricker S (2013) On shared understanding in software engineering, Software engineering 2012. Aachen, Germany
- Schmidt M (2002) The business case guide. Solution Matrix, Boston
- Davis A (2005) Just enough requirements management. Dorset House Publishing, New York
- IEEE (1990) IEEE standard glossary of software engineering terminology 610.12-1990
Cited by
Rezaei, M., Jafari‐Sadeghi, V., Cao, D., & Mahdiraji, H. A. (2021) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120724 · Cited by 90
Natsiavas, P., Rasmussen, J., Voss-Knude, M., Votis, K., Coppolino, L., Campegiani, P., Cano, I., Marí, D., Faiella, G., Clemente, F., et al. (2018) · BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making · doi:10.1186/s12911-018-0664-0 · Cited by 40
Werner, C., Li, Z. S., Ernst, N., & Damian, D. (2020) · IEEE International Requirements Engineering Conference (RE) · doi:10.1109/re48521.2020.00021 · Cited by 42
Video as a By-Product of Digital Prototyping: Capturing the Dynamic Aspect of Interaction
Karras, O., Unger‐Windeler, C., Glauer, L., & Schneider, K. A. (2017) · IEEE International Requirements Engineering Conference Workshops (REW) · doi:10.1109/rew.2017.16 · Cited by 23
On the Use of Domain and System Knowledge Modeling in Goal-Based Event-B Specifications
Mammar, A., & Laleau, R. (2016) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-47166-2_23 · Cited by 20
Metadata
- Authors
- Fricker, S. A., Grau, R., & Zwingli, A.
- Affiliations
- Blekinge Institute of Technology (SE)
- Corresponding author
- Fricker, Samuel A.
- ORCID
- Fricker, Samuel A.
- Venue
- Requirements Engineering for Digital Health
- Publisher
- Springer International Publishing
- Published
- 2014-10-11
- Pages
- 25-46
- OpenAlex
- W1544524595
- Cited by
- 61
- References
- 85
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 10.51
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- urn.kb.se
- Licence
- other-oa
- www.springernature.com/gp/researchers/text-and-data-mining (tdm)
- www.springernature.com/gp/researchers/text-and-data-mining (vor)
- Locations
- Springer eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Diva portal (Dalarna University Library) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Software Engineering Techniques and Practices
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Software › Advanced Software Engineering Methodologies
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Systems Engineering Methodologies and Applications
- Keywords
- requirements engineering, best practices, requirements specification, requirements validation, industrial practice, software project success factors, requirements engineering techniques
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
