CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 85

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Querying Datasets on the Web with High Availability

Verborgh, Ruben, Hartig, Olaf, De Meester, Ben, Haesendonck, Gerald, De Vocht, Laurens, Vander Sande, Miel, Cyganiak, Richard, Colpaert, Pieter, Mannens, Erik, Van de Walle, Rik·2014·Lecture Notes in Computer Science
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-11964-9_12
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-319-11964-9_12

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • More light-weight interfaces such as read-write Linked Data Platform, Triple Pattern Fragments, and CumulusRDF constitute a scalability improvement but do not necessarily lead to perfect uptimes.

    “While this constitutes a scalability improvement (at the cost of, for instance, slower queries), it does not necessarily lead to perfect uptimes, as servers can be down for other reasons than excessive workload.”

    From Decentralized provenance-aware publishing with nanopublications (2016) · cites this paper as Verborgh et al., 2014

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 17

  1. Amundsen, M.: Hypermedia types. In: rest: From Research to Practice, pp. 93–116. Springer (2011) · DOI
  2. Bizer, C., Heath, T., Berners-Lee, T.: Linked Data – the story so far. International Journal on Semantic Web and Information Systems 5(3), 1–22 (2009) · DOI
  3. Bizer, C., Schultz, A.: The Berlin sparql benchmark. International Journal on Semantic Web and Information Systems 5(2), 1–24 (2009) · DOI
  4. Buil-Aranda, C., Hogan, A.: sparql Web-querying infrastructure: Ready for action? In: Proceedings of the 12th International Semantic Web Conference (November 2013) · DOI · Paper page
  5. Erling, O., Mikhailov, I.: Virtuoso: rdf support in a native rdbms. In: Semantic Web Information Management, pp. 501–519. Springer (2010) · DOI
  6. Fernández, J.D., Martínez-Prieto, M.A., Gutirrez, C., Polleres, A., Arias, M.: Binary rdf representation for publication and exchange (hdt). Journal of Web Semantics 19, 22–41 (2013) · DOI
  7. Fielding, R.T.: Architectural Styles and the Design of Network-based Software Architectures. Ph.D. thesis, University of California (2000)
  8. Graefe, G.: Query evaluation techniques for large databases. acm Computing Surveys 25(2), 73–169 (June 1993) · DOI
  9. Grobe, M.: rdf, Jena, sparql and the Semantic Web. In: Proceedings of the 37th Annual acm siguccs Fall Conference: Communication and Collaboration (2009), doi:10.1145/1629501.1629525 · DOI
  10. Hartig, O.: Zero-knowledge query planning for an iterator implementation of link traversal based query execution. In: Antoniou, G., Grobelnik, M., Simperl, E., Parsia, B., Plexousakis, D., De Leenheer, P., Pan, J. (eds.) ESWC 2011, Part I. LNCS, vol. 6643, pp. 154–169. Springer, Heidelberg (2011) · DOI
  11. Hartig, O.: An overview on execution strategies for Linked Data queries. Datenbank-Spektrum 13(2), 89–99 (2013) · DOI · Paper page
  12. Hartig, O., Bizer, C., Freytag, J.-C.: Executing SPARQL Queries over the Web of Linked Data. In: Bernstein, A., Karger, D.R., Heath, T., Feigenbaum, L., Maynard, D., Motta, E., Thirunarayan, K. (eds.) ISWC 2009. LNCS, vol. 5823, pp. 293–309. Springer, Heidelberg (2009) · DOI
  13. Morsey, M., Lehmann, J.: dbpedia sparql benchmark performance assessment with real queries on real data. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Semantic Web Conference (2011) · DOI
  14. Pérez, J., Arenas, M., Gutierrez, C.: Semantics and complexity of sparql. acm Transactions on Database Systems 34(3), 16:1–16:45 (2009) · DOI
  15. Schmidt, M., Hornung, T., Meier, M., Pinkel, C., Lausen, G.: SP2Bench: A sparql performance benchmark. In: Semantic Web Information Management (2010) · DOI
  16. Verborgh, R., Vander Sande, M., Colpaert, P., Coppens, S., Mannens, E., Van de Walle, R.: Web-scale querying through Linked Data Fragments. In: Proceedings of the 7th Workshop on Linked Data on the Web (2014)
  17. Wilde, E., Hausenblas, M.: restful sparql? You name it! – Aligning sparql with rest and resource orientation. In: Proceedings of the 4 Workshop on Emerging Web Services Technology, pp. 39–43. ACM (2009) · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Verborgh, R., Hartig, O., De Meester, B., Haesendonck, G., De Vocht, L., Vander Sande, M., Cyganiak, R., Colpaert, P., Mannens, E., & Van de Walle, R.
Venue
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published
2014
Pages
180-196
ISSN
  • 0302-9743
  • 1611-3349
DOI
10.1007/978-3-319-11964-9_12
Cited by
85
References
0
Language
en
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review