Cited by 11Machine Learning and Data ClassificationEvolutionary Algorithms and ApplicationsMachine Learning and Algorithms

Dynamically Adaptive Genetic Algorithm to Select Training Data for SVMs

Kawulok, Michal, Nalepa, Jakub·2014·Lecture Notes in Computer Science

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-319-12027-0_20

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Training SVM on large datasets is inefficient or slow and a bottleneck because of high computational complexity (QP time O(n^3) and space O(n^2)) and model complexity.

    “However, it is inefficient or impracticable to implement support vector machine in dealing with large scale training set due to its computational difficulties as well as the model complexity.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kawulok, M., & Nalepa, J.
Affiliations
Silesian University of Technology (PL)
Corresponding author
Nalepa, Jakub
Venue
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
Published
2014
Pages
242-254
ISSN
  • 0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
  • 1611-3349
OpenAlex
W1040407216
Cited by
11
References
1
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2
FWCI
0.79
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Lecture notes in computer science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning and Data Classification
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Evolutionary Algorithms and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning and Algorithms
Keywords
training data selection, support vector machine, noisy data

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review