CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 1Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsCancer survivorship and careReligion, Spirituality, and Psychology

The DOI matches its Crossref record; its reference list is not available.

Mindfulness in Oncology: Healing Through Relationship

Carlson, Linda E.·2015·Mindful Medical Practice
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-15777-1_12
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-319-15777-1_12

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

Cited by 1

Metadata

Authors
Carlson, L. E.
Affiliations
University of Calgary (CA)
Corresponding author
Carlson, Linda E.
ORCID
Carlson, Linda E.
Venue
Mindful Medical Practice
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published
2015
Pages
71-74
DOI
10.1007/978-3-319-15777-1_12
OpenAlex
W2189194415
Cited by
1
References
0
Citations by year
2023: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
Locations
Springer eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
Keywords
mindfulness, cancer patients, lymphoma, mindfulness-based interventions, therapeutic relationship, patient-clinician relationship, coping with cancer, fear of death, psychiatric history, psycho-oncology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review