Cited by 27Technology Use by Older AdultsTechnology Adoption and User BehaviourHealth, Technology, Consumer Behavior

The Adoption of Smartphones Among Older Adults in China

Open access
Gao, Shang, Yang, Yuhao, Krogstie, John·2015·IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-319-16274-4_12

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gao, S., Yang, Y., & Krogstie, J.
Affiliations
  • Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NO)
  • Zhongnan University of Economics and Law (CN)
Venue
IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology
Published
2015
Volume
AICT-449
Pages
112-122
ISSN
  • 1868-422X (ISSN-L)
  • 1868-4238
OpenAlex
W284338845
Cited by
27
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 5
FWCI
12.12
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IFIP advances in information and communication technology (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Technology Use by Older Adults
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Health, Technology, Consumer Behavior
Keywords
smartphone adoption, older adults, UTAUT, information diffusion theory, observability, compatibility, perceived enjoyment, price value, social influence, performance expectancy, China

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review