Cited by 17

Trauma, Religion, and Spirituality: Pathways to Healing

Harper, Anna R., Pargament, Kenneth I.·2015·Traumatic Stress and Long-Term Recovery

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-319-18866-9_19

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Spiritual coping mechanisms are generally delineated as either positive or negative.

    “Drawing again on the wisdom of Harper and Pargament (2015), spiritual coping mechanisms are generally delineated as either positive or negative.”

    From Trauma, Spirituality, and Healing: A Journey through the Lens of an Incarcerated Person (2022) · cites this paper as Harper and Pargament (2015)

  • Positive coping mechanisms generally increase people's ability to heal from trauma, whereas negative coping mechanisms typically exacerbate posttraumatic distress.

    “The main difference is that, while exceptions exist, positive coping mechanisms generally increase people's ability to heal from trauma, whereas negative coping mechanisms typically exacerbate posttraumatic distress (Harper and Pargament 2015).”

    From Trauma, Spirituality, and Healing: A Journey through the Lens of an Incarcerated Person (2022) · cites this paper as Harper and Pargament 2015

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Harper, A. R., & Pargament, K. I.
Venue
Traumatic Stress and Long-Term Recovery
Published
2015
Pages
349-367
Cited by
17
References
5
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review