The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A Socio-Technical Investigation into Smartphone Security
Open accessOverview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“In their study on smartphone security, Volkamer et al. (2015) concluded that lacks of awareness, concern, self-efficacy and compulsion prevent users from adopting smartphone security apps.”
From Putting the privacy paradox to the test: Online privacy and security behaviors among users with technical knowledge, privacy awareness, and financial resources (2019) · cites this paper as Volkamer et al. (2015)
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 26
- Botha, R.A., Furnell, S.M., Clarke, N.L.: From desktop to mobile: examining the security experience. Comput. Secur. 28(3), 130–137 (2009) · DOI
- Campbell, M.: Phone invaders. New Sci. 223(2977), 32–35 (2014) · DOI
- Canova, G., Volkamer, M., Bergmann, C., Borza, R.: NoPhish: an anti-phishing education app. In: Mauw, S., Jensen, C.D. (eds.) STM 2014. LNCS, vol. 8743, pp. 188–192. Springer, Heidelberg (2014) · DOI
- Clark, S., Goodspeed, T., Metzger, P., Wasserman, Z., Xu, K., Blaze, M.: Why (special agent) johnny (still) can’t encrypt: a security analysis of the APCO project 25 two-way radio system. In: USENIX Security Symposium (2011)
- Debatin, B., Lovejoy, J.P., Horn, A.K., Hughes, B.N.: Facebook and online privacy: attitudes, behaviors, and unintended consequences. J. Comput. Mediat. Commun. 15(1), 83–108 (2009) · DOI · Paper page
- Felt, A.P., Egelman, S., Wagner, D.: I’ve got 99 problems, but vibration ain’t one: a survey of smartphone users’ concerns. In: 2nd ACM Workshop on Security and Privacy in Smartphones and Mobile Devices, pp. 33–44. ACM (2012) · DOI
- Ferreira, A., Huynen, J.-L., Koenig, V., Lenzini, G.: Socio-technical security analysis of wireless hotspots. In: Tryfonas, T., Askoxylakis, I. (eds.) HAS 2014. LNCS, vol. 8533, pp. 306–317. Springer, Heidelberg (2014) · DOI
- Furnell, S., Evangelatos, K.: Public awareness and perceptions of biometrics. Comput. Fraud Secur. 2007(1), 8–13 (2007) · DOI
- Gaw, S., Felten, E.W., Fernandez-Kelly, P.: Secrecy, flagging, and paranoia: adoption criteria in encrypted email. In: SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI 2006, pp. 591–600 (2006) · DOI
- Harbach, M., Fahl, S., Rieger, M., Smith, M.: On the acceptance of privacy-preserving authentication technology: the curious case of national identity cards. In: De Cristofaro, E., Wright, M. (eds.) PETS 2013. LNCS, vol. 7981, pp. 245–264. Springer, Heidelberg (2013) · DOI
- Harbach, M., Hettig, M., Weber, S., Smith, M.: Using personal examples to improve risk communication for security & privacy decisions. In: 32nd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI 2014, pp. 2647–2656. ACM (2014). http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2556288.2556978 · DOI
- Harbach, M., von Zezschwitz, E., Fichtner, A., De Luca, A., Smith, M.: It’s a hard lock life: a field study of smartphone (un) locking behavior and risk perception. In: Symposium on Usable Privacy and Security (SOUPS) (2014)
- Herath, T., Rao, H.R.: Encouraging information security behaviors in organizations: role of penalties, pressures and perceived effectiveness. Decis. Support Syst. 47(2), 154–165 (2009) · DOI
- Kelley, P.G., Consolvo, S., Cranor, L.F., Jung, J., Sadeh, N., Wetherall, D.: A conundrum of permissions: installing applications on an android smartphone. In: Blyth, J., Dietrich, S., Camp, L.J. (eds.) FC 2012. LNCS, vol. 7398, pp. 68–79. Springer, Heidelberg (2012) · DOI
- Lazou, A., Weir, G.R.: Perceived risk and sensitive data on mobile devices. In: Cyberforensics, pp. 183–196. University of Strathclyde (2011)
- Lin, J., Amini, S., Hong, J.I., Sadeh, N., Lindqvist, J., Zhang, J.: Expectation and purpose: understanding users’ mental models of mobile app privacy through crowdsourcing. In: ACM Conference on Ubiquitous Computing, UbiComp 2012, pp. 501–510. ACM (2012). http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2370216.2370290 · DOI
- Liu, S., Silverman, M.: A practical guide to biometric security technology. IT Prof. 3(1), 27–32 (2001) · DOI
- Muslukhov, I., Boshmaf, Y., Kuo, C., Lester, J., Beznosov, K.: Understanding users’ requirements for data protection in smartphones. In: Data Engineering Workshops (ICDEW), pp. 228–235. IEEE (2012) · DOI
- Ophoff, J., Robinson, M.: Exploring end-user smartphone security awareness within a South African context. In: Information Security for South Africa (ISSA 2014), pp. 1–7. IEEE (2014) · DOI
- Pramod, D., Raman, R.: A study on the user perception and awareness of smartphone security. Int. J. Appl. Eng. Res. ISSN 9(23), 19133–19144 (2014)
- Renaud, K., Volkamer, M., Renkema-Padmos, A.: Why doesn’t jane protect her privacy? In: De Cristofaro, E., Murdoch, S.J. (eds.) PETS 2014. LNCS, vol. 8555, pp. 244–262. Springer, Heidelberg (2014) · DOI
- Sasse, M.A., Flechais, I.: Usable security: what is it? how do we get it?. In: Security and usability: designing secure systems that people can use. pp. 13–30. O’Reilly Books (2005)
- Smith, S.W.: Humans in the loop: human-computer interaction and security. IEEE Secur. Priv. 1(3), 75–79 (2003) · DOI
- Solove, D.J.: “I’ve got nothing to hide” and other misunderstandings of privacy. San Diego law Rev. 44, 745 (2007)
- Wash, R.: Folk models of home computer security. In: Proceedings of the Sixth Symposium on Usable Privacy and Security, p. 11. ACM, Redmond, WA (2010) · DOI
- Whitten, A., Tygar, J.D.: Why Johnny can’t encrypt: a usability evaluation of PGP 5.0. In: 8th USENIX Security Symposium, SSYM 1999, vol. 8, pp. 169–184 (1999)
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Barth, S., de Jong, M. D. T., Junger, M., Hartel, P. H., & Roppelt, J. C. (2019) · Telematics and Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.tele.2019.03.003 · Cited by 260
Metadata
- Authors
- Volkamer, M., Renaud, K., Kulyk, O., & Emeröz, S.
- Affiliations
- Technische Universität Darmstadt (DE)
- University of Glasgow (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Renaud, Karen
- Venue
- Lecture Notes in Computer Science
- Publisher
- Springer International Publishing
- Published
- 2015
- Pages
- 265-273
- ISSN
- 0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
- 1611-3349
- OpenAlex
- W2197732995
- Cited by
- 20
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 2.03
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Locations
- Lecture notes in computer science (publishedVersion)
- ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam) (acceptedVersion)
- Repository KITopen (Karlsruhe Institute of Technology) (acceptedVersion)
- KITopen
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information and Cyber Security
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › User Authentication and Security Systems
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
- Keywords
- smartphone security, user behavior, usability, security mechanisms, socio-technical factors, media campaigns, security awareness
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review