Cited by 33Gastrointestinal motility and disordersIon Channels and ReceptorsPain Mechanisms and Treatments

Extrinsic Sensory Innervation of the Gut: Structure and Function

Brookes, Simon, Chen, Nan, Humenick, Adam, Spencer, Nick J., Costa, Marcello·2016·Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology

Abstract

Extrinsic sensory neurons play a key role in the function of the gastrointestinal tract. They are responsible for the sensations that arise in the gut and can initiate automatic reflexes. In some cases, disordered sensation is clinically problematic-pain, bloating, excessive urgency and nausea are well-known examples. Major advances have been made in understanding the function of somatic sensory neurons in the last 50 years. However, the sensory neurons that mediate sensations from the viscera remain less well understood. This is partly because viscera receive a dense autonomic innervation that can be difficult to separate from extrinsic sensory neurons. A key requirement to understand the genesis of sensation is to distinguish the different classes of sensory neurons and the types of stimuli which they encode. The aim of this short paper is to summarise what was known about these matters 30 years ago and highlight some of the major advances in the understanding of the types of extrinsic sensory neurons to the gut. Necessarily, the choice of papers is somewhat idiosyncratic, but they illustrate the range of advances that have been made in distinguishing the different classes of gastrointestinal afferent nerves.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-319-27592-5_7

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The sensory tone of the vagal/pelvic and splanchnic signaling pathways is not mutually exclusive, and physiological events relating to gut status can also be transmitted through spinal splanchnic innervation via the NTS of the brainstem to higher centers.

    “However, it must be stated that the sensory tone of these signaling pathways is not mutually exclusive, and that physiological events relating to the status of the gut including distension, motility, inflammation, pain, pH change, cellular damage or temperature (Brookes et al., 2016) can also be transmitted through spinal splanchnic innervation via NTS of the brainstem (Christianson et al., 2009;R”

    From The Microbiota-Gut-Brain Axis (2019) · cites this paper as Brookes et al., 2016

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 56 · Cited by 33

Authors
Brookes, S., Chen, N., Humenick, A., Spencer, N. J., & Costa, M.
Affiliations
Flinders University (AU)
Corresponding author
Brookes, Simon
Venue
Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology
Published
2016
Volume
891
Pages
63-69
ISSN
  • 0065-2598 (ISSN-L)
  • 2214-8019
OpenAlex
W2462223799
Cited by
33
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3
FWCI
12.07
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Advances in experimental medicine and biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Sensory Systems › Ion Channels and Receptors
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
Keywords
intestine, visceral sensation, visceral pain, visceral reflexes, gastrointestinal motility
MeSH terms
Animals, Autonomic Nervous System, Humans, Sensory Receptor Cells, Gastrointestinal Tract

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review