Cited by 968Reinforcement Learning in RoboticsAI-based Problem Solving and PlanningMulti-Agent Systems and Negotiation

A Concise Introduction to Decentralized POMDPs

Oliehoek, Frans A., Amato, Christopher·2016·SpringerBriefs in Intelligent Systems

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-319-28929-8

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Oliehoek, F. A., & Amato, C.
Affiliations
  • University of Liverpool (GB)
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
Venue
SpringerBriefs in Intelligent Systems
Published
2016
ISSN
  • 2196-548X (ISSN-L)
  • 2196-5498
OpenAlex
W2747213132
Cited by
968
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 115 · 2025: 178 · 2024: 154 · 2023: 173 · 2022: 106 · 2021: 119 · 2020: 56 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 1
FWCI
5.29
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • SpringerBriefs in intelligent systems (publishedVersion)
  • CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
  • UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (submittedVersion)
  • DIAL (Catholic University of Leuven) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI-based Problem Solving and Planning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation
Keywords
decentralized POMDPs, partially observable Markov decision processes, sequential decision making, multi-agent planning, decentralized control, decision-theoretic planning, reinforcement learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review