Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 30Legal Rights and Human RightsPhilosophical Ethics and TheoryPolitical Philosophy and Ethics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 22 of the 22 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Is Vulnerability the Foundation of Human Rights?

Open access
Andorno, Roberto·2016·Ius Gentium: Comparative Perspectives on Law and Justice

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-319-32693-1_11

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 22 references

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Gros Espiell, H. “Introduction”, in: UNESCO’s Division of Ethics of Science and Technologies (ed.), Genèse de la Déclaration universelle sur le génome humain et les droits de l’homme (Paris, UNESCO, 1999), pp. 1–7.
  2. Reichert, E. Understanding Human Rights (London, Sage Publications, 2006).
  3. Rorty, R. “Human rights, rationality and sentimentality”, in: Shute, S. and Hurley, S. (eds.), On Human Rights. The Oxford Amnesty Lectures (New York, Basic Books, 1993), pp. 112–134.
  4. Turner, B. Vulnerability and human rights (University Park PA, Pennsylvania State University Press, 2006).

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Andorno, R.
Affiliations
University of Zurich (CH)
Corresponding author
Andorno, Roberto
Venue
Ius Gentium: Comparative Perspectives on Law and Justice
Published
2016
Pages
257-272
ISSN
  • 1534-6781 (ISSN-L)
  • 2214-9902
OpenAlex
W2515385213
Cited by
30
References
22
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1
FWCI
24.67
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Ius gentium (publishedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (acceptedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Law › Legal Rights and Human Rights
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophical Ethics and Theory
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political Philosophy and Ethics
Keywords
vulnerability, human rights, human dignity, Emmanuel Levinas, Paul Ricoeur, Richard Rorty, Turner, World War II, universal human rights, reproductive cloning, ethics of biotechnology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.