Cited by 17
The DOI matches its Crossref record.
What Do the Patterns Mean? Archaeological Distributions and Bias in Survey Data
Cowley, David C.·2016·Quantitative Methods in the Humanities and Social Sciences
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-319-40658-9_7
Cites
Statistics
Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.
Verification
Claims the paper makes
We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“However, these patterns are subject to multiple biases that mostly lie in the unstructured and unrepresentative nature of the archaeological datasets (Cowley 2016; Knappett 2004; van Leusen 1996; van Leusen 2002).”
From From landscape affordances to landscape connectivity: contextualizing an archaeology of human ecology (2020) · cites this paper as Cowley 2016
In the citing paper
“In most cases, the actual bias is a composition of interdependencies of natural preconditions (e.g. drainage potential, river course) and anthropogenic reactions to them (Cowley 2016).”
From From landscape affordances to landscape connectivity: contextualizing an archaeology of human ecology (2020) · cites this paper as Cowley 2016
In the citing paper
“Much (if not all) of the archaeological record's spatial patterning has been shaped (directly or indirectly, obviously or subtly) by underlying network structures (e.g.Cowley, 2016;Verhagen et al., 2013;Makohonienko, 2009); be they navigable rivers, pathways cut through forests or paved roads.”
From Exploratory network reconstruction with sparse archaeological data and XTENT (2022) · cites this paper as Cowley, 2016
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 44
- Armit, I. and Ralston, I. B. M. (1997). The Iron Age. In K. J. Edwards and I. B. M. Ralston (Eds). Scotland: Environment and Archaeology, 8000 BC – Ad 1000. Chichester: Wiley.
- Bennett, R., Cowley, D. and De Laet, V. (2014). The data explosion: tackling the taboo of automatic feature recognition in airborne survey data. Antiquity 88, pp. 896-905. doi:10.1017/S0003598X00050766. · DOI
- Bennett, R., Welham, K., Hill, R. and Ford, A. (2013). Using lidar as part of a multi-sensor approach to archaeological survey and interpretation. In Opitz, R. S. and Cowley, D. C. (Eds). Interpreting archaeological topography: airborne laser scanning, 3D data and interpretation. Oxford: Oxbow. pp. 197-205.
- Campana, S. (2011). ‘Total Archaeology’ to reduce the need for Rescue Archaeology: The BREBEMI Project (Italy). In Cowley, D.C. (Ed.). Remote sensing for Archaeological Heritage Management. Brussels: EAC/Archaeolingua. pp. 33-41.
- Campana, S. and Dabas, M. (2011). Archaeological Impact Assessment: The BREBEMI Project (Italy). Archaeological Prospection 18: pp. 139-148. doi: 10.1002/arp.407. · DOI
- Cowley, D.C. (1991). Some Burnt Mounds in Mid-Northumberland. Archaeologia Aeliana 5th Series, Volume XIX, pp. 119-121.
- Cowley, D.C. (2002). A case study in the analysis of patterns of aerial reconnaissance in a lowland area of southwest Scotland. Archaeological Prospection 9(4), pp. 255-65. · DOI
- Cowley, D.C. (2009). The Traprain environs in a regional perspective. In Haselgrove, C. (Ed.). The Traprain Law Environs Project - Fieldwork and Excavations 2000-2004. Edinburgh: Society of Antiquaries of Scotland. pp. 205-23.
- Cowley, D.C. (2011). Remote sensing for archaeology and heritage management – site discovery, interpretation and registration. In Cowley, D.C. (Ed.). Remote sensing for Archaeological Heritage Management. Brussels: EAC/Archaeolingua. pp. 43-55.
- Cowley, D.C. (2012). Newstead and environs from the air. In Hunter, F. and Keppie, L. (Eds). A Roman Frontier Post and its People, Newstead 1911-2011. Edinburgh: National Museums of Scotland. pp. 41-49.
- Cowley, D. C. (2013). What kind of gaps? Some approaches to understanding bias in remote sensing data. Archeologia Aerea 7(13), pp. 76-88.
- Cowley, D. C. (2015). Aerial Photographs and Aerial Reconnaissance for Landscape Studies. In Chavarria Arnau, A. and Reynolds, A. (Eds). Detecting and Understanding Historic Landscapes. Mantova: Post-Classical Archaeologies. pp. 37-66.
- Cowley, D. C. (2016). Creating the cropmark archaeological record in East Lothian, southeast Scotland. In Crellin, R., Fowler, C. and Tipping, R. (Eds). Prehistory without Borders: Prehistoric Archaeology of the Tyne-Forth Region. Oxford: Oxbow.
- Cowley, D. C. and Dickson, A. L. (2007). Clays and ‘difficult’ soils in eastern and southern Scotland: dealing with the gaps. In Mills, J. and Palmer, R. (Eds). Populating Clay Landscape. Stroud: Tempus. pp. 43-54.
- Cowley, D.C. and Gilmour, S. M. (2005). Some observations on the nature of aerial survey. In Brophy, K. and Cowley, D. (Eds). From the Air – understanding aerial archaeology. Stroud: Tempus. pp. 50-63.
- Crawford, O. G. S. (1930). Editorial Notes. Antiquity IV, pp. 273-8.
- Crawford, O. G. S. (1939). Air Reconnaissance of Roman Scotland. Antiquity XIII, pp. 280-92. · DOI
- Crow, J. and Turner, S. (2009). Silvri and the Thracian hinterland of Istanbul: an historic landscape. Anatolian Studies 59, pp. 167-81. · DOI
- De Guio, A. (2015). Cropping for a better future: Vegetation Indices in Archaeology. In Chavarria Arnau, A. and Reynolds, A. (Eds). Detecting and Understanding Historic Landscapes. Mantova: Post-Classical Archaeologies. pp. 109-52.
- Driscoll, S. (1997). A Pictish settlement in north-east Fife: the Scottish Field School of Archaeology excavations at Easter Kinnear. Tayside and Fife Archaeological Journal 3, pp. 74-118.
- Evans, R. and Jones, R. J. A. (1977). Crop marks and soils at two archaeological sites in Britain. Journal of Archaeological Science 4, pp. 63-76. · DOI
- Fairweather, A. D. and Ralston, I. B. M. (1993). The Neolithic timber hall at Balbridie, Grampian Region, Scotland. Antiquity 67, pp. 313–23. · DOI
- Featherstone, R. and Bewley, R. (2000). Recent aerial reconnaissance in North Oxfordshire. Oxoniensia 65, pp. 13-26.
- Fitch, S., Gaffney, V., Gearey, B., Ramsey, E. (2011). Between the Lines – enhancing methodologies for the exploration of extensive, inundated palaeolandscapes. In Cowley, D.C. (Ed.). Remote sensing for Archaeological Heritage Management. Brussels: EAC/Archaeolingua. pp. 173-204.
- Halliday, S. (1990). Patterns of fieldwork and the distribution of burnt mounds in Scotland. In Buckley, V. (compiler). Burnt Offerings – International Contributions to Burnt Mound Archaeology. Dublin: Wordwell. pp. 60-1
- Halliday, S. (2011). Pattern, perception and preconception: recognizing regionality in Scottish prehistory. In Jones, A. M. and Kirkham, G. (Eds). Beyond the Core – Reflections on regionality in prehistory. Oxford: Oxbow. pp. 19-32.
- Halliday, S. (2013). I Walked, I Saw, I surveyed, but what did I see?… and what did I survey. In Opitz, R.S. and Cowley, D.C. (Eds). Interpreting archaeological topography: airborne laser scanning, 3D data and interpretation. Oxford: Oxbow. pp. 63- 75.
- Hanson, W. S. (2005). Sun, sand and see: creating bias in the archaeological record. In Brophy, K. and Cowley, D. (Eds). From the Air – understanding aerial archaeology. Stroud: Tempus. pp. 73-93.
- Haselgrove, C. (Ed.) (2009). The Traprain Law Environs Project - Fieldwork and Excavations 2000-2004. Edinburgh: Society of Antiquaries of Scotland.
- Huggett, J. (2013). Disciplinary issues: challenging the research and practice of computer applications in archaeology. In Papadopoulos, K., Chrysanthi, A., Murietta-Flores, P., Romanowska, I., Earl, G., Sly, T. and Wheatley, D. (Eds). Proceedings of the 40th International Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology Conference, Amsterdam: Archaeopress. pp. 13-24.
- Jones, R. H. (2005). The advantages of bias in Roman Studies. In Brophy, K. and Cowley, D. (Eds). From the Air – understanding aerial archaeology. Stroud: Tempus. pp. 86-93.
- Lasaponara, R. and Masini, N. (2012). Image enhancement, feature extraction and geospatial analysis in an archaeological perspective. In Lasaponara, R. and Masini, N. (Eds). Satellite Remote Sensing – A new Tool for Archaeology. New York: Springer. pp. 17-63. · DOI
- Laurie, T. (2004). Springs, Woods and Transhumance: Reconstructing a Pennine Landscape during Later Prehistory. Landscapes 5(1), pp 73-103. · DOI
- Macinnes, L. (1984). Settlement and economy: East Lothian and the Tyne-Forth province. In Miket, R. and Burgess, C. (Eds). Between and beyond the Walls: Essays on the Prehistory of Northern Britain in Honour of George Jobey. Edinburgh: John Donald. pp. 176-98.
- Maynard, D. (1993). Burnt mounds around a pipeline in Dumfries and Galloway. Transactions of the Dumfriesshire and Galloway Natural History and Antiquarian Society, Series 3, LXVII, pp. 33-52.
- Neubauer, Trinks, Salisbury, Einwögerer: Neubauer, W., Trinks, I., Salisbury, R. and Einwögerer, C. (Eds) (2013). Archaeological Prospection, Proceedings of the 10 th International Conference – Vienna, May 29 th – June 2 nd 2013. Vienna: Austrian Academy of Sciences Press.
- Oakey, M. 2005. Patterns of aerial photography in the Central Midlands of England. In Brophy, K.and Cowley, D. (Eds). From the Air – understanding aerial archaeology. Stroud: Tempus. pp. 141-50.
- Powlesland, D. (2011). Identifying the unimaginable – Managing the unmanageable. In Cowley, D.C. (Ed.). Remote sensing for Archaeological Heritage Management. Brussels: EAC/Archaeolingua. pp. 17-32.
- St Joseph, J. K. S. (1976). Air reconnaissance of Roman Scotland 1939-75. Glasgow Archaeological Journal 4, pp. 1-28. · DOI
- St Joseph, J. K. S. (1977). Air reconnaissance in Roman Britain 1973-76. Journal of Roman Studies LXVII, pp. 125-61. · DOI
- Turner, S. and Crow, J. (2010). Unlocking historic landscapes in the Eastern Mediterranean: two pilot studies using Historic Landscape Characterisation. Antiquity 84, pp. 216-29. · DOI
- Verhoeven, G. (2009). Beyond Conventional Boundaries. New Technologies, Methodologies, and Procedures for the Benefit of Aerial Archaeological Data Acquisition and Analysis. PhD thesis Ghent University.
- Whimster, R. (1983). Aerial reconnaissance from Cambridge: a retrospective view 1945-80. In Maxwell, G. S. (Ed.). The impact of aerial reconnaissance on Archaeology. London: Council for British Archaeology. pp. 92-105.
- Wilson, D. R. (2005). Bias in aerial reconnaissance. In Brophy, K. and Cowley, D. (Eds). From the Air – understanding aerial archaeology. Stroud: Tempus. pp. 64-72.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Kempf, M. (2020) · Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences · doi:10.1007/s12520-020-01157-4 · Cited by 30
Exploratory network reconstruction with sparse archaeological data and XTENT
Ducke, B., & Suchowska, P. (2022) · Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory · doi:10.1007/s10816-021-09529-3 · Cited by 12
Metadata
- Authors
- Cowley, D. C.
- Venue
- Quantitative Methods in the Humanities and Social Sciences
- Publisher
- Springer International Publishing
- Published
- 2016
- Pages
- 147-170
- ISSN
- 2199-0956
- 2199-0964
- Cited by
- 17
- References
- 0
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
