The Subretinal Implant ALPHA: Implantation and Functional Results
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The highest visual acuities reported to date, measured with the Landolt-C test, were 20/460 with the subretinal implant PRIMA (in AMD patients) and 20/546 with the subretinal implant Alpha-AMS (in RP patients).
“The highest visual acuities reported to date, as measured with the Landolt-C test, were 20/460 with the subretinal implant PRIMA (in AMD patients) [48] and 20/546 with the subretinal implant Alpha-AMS (in RP patients) [133].”
From Advances in visual prostheses: engineering and biological challenges (2022) · cites this paper as [133]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 23 · Cited by 27
- Authors
- Zrenner, E., Bartz-Schmidt, K. U., Besch, D., Gekeler, F., Koitschev, A., Sachs, H. G., & Stingl, K.
- Affiliations
- University of Tübingen (DE)
- Universitätsklinikum Tübingen (DE)
- Klinikum Stuttgart (DE)
- Krankenhaus Dresden-Friedrichstadt (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Zrenner, Eberhart
- Venue
- Artificial Vision
- Publisher
- Springer International Publishing
- Published
- 2016-11-25
- Pages
- 65-83
- OpenAlex
- W2553987722
- Cited by
- 27
- References
- 23
- Citations by year
- 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2
- FWCI
- 5.81
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Springer eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Retinal Development and Disorders
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Retinal Diseases and Treatments
- Keywords
- subretinal implant, inherited retinal degeneration, retinal prosthesis, implant surgery, implant replacement, vision restoration, psychophysical testing, self-reported outcomes, implant safety, microsaccades, retinotopic mapping, CE marking
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review