Cited by 3Cognitive Abilities and TestingCognitive Functions and MemoryEducational and Psychological Assessments

Introduction

Strobach, Tilo, Karbach, Julia·2016·Cognitive Training

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-319-42662-4_1

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Contrary to earlier hypotheses, working memory and fluid intelligence do not rely on the same neural mechanisms.

    “Second and most important, our findings support recent empirical evidence showing that WM and fluid intelligence do not share the same neural mechanisms as previously hypothesized (e.g., Halford et al., 2007;Jaeggi et al., 2008;Strobach & Karbach, 2016;Taatgen, 2013Taatgen, , 2016)).”

    From Working memory training in typically developing children: A multilevel meta-analysis (2020) · cites this paper as Strobach & Karbach, 2016

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Strobach, T., & Karbach, J.
Affiliations
  • MSH Medical School Hamburg – University of Applied Sciences and Medical University (DE)
  • Goethe University Frankfurt (DE)
Corresponding author
Strobach, Tilo
Venue
Cognitive Training
Published
2016
Pages
1-5
OpenAlex
W4230492389
Cited by
3
References
3
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Springer eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Educational and Psychological Assessments
Keywords
cognitive training, cognitive domain, age groups, methodological approaches, scientific teaching

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review