Class n-Gram Models for Very Large Vocabulary Speech Recognition of Finnish and Estonian
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In previous work, improvement was made only when interpolating word and class models.
“Improvement was made only when interpolating word and class models.”
From Automatic Speech Recognition With Very Large Conversational Finnish and Estonian Vocabularies (2017) · cites this paper as [5]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Automatic Speech Recognition With Very Large Conversational Finnish and Estonian Vocabularies
Enarvi, S., Smit, P., Virpioja, S., & Kurimo, M. (2017) · IEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing · doi:10.1109/taslp.2017.2743344 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Varjokallio, M., Kurimo, M., & Virpioja, S.
- Affiliations
- Aalto University (FI)
- Corresponding author
- Varjokallio, Matti
- ORCID
- Kurimo, Mikko
- Venue
- Lecture Notes in Computer Science
- Publisher
- Springer International Publishing
- Published
- 2016
- Pages
- 133-144
- ISSN
- 0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
- 1611-3349
- OpenAlex
- W2522481886
- Cited by
- 6
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3
- FWCI
- 0.72
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Lecture notes in computer science (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech Recognition and Synthesis
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Speech and Audio Processing
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech and dialogue systems
- Keywords
- Finnish language, Estonian language, broadcast news, linear interpolation, perplexity, word error rate
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
