3D Deep Learning for Multi-modal Imaging-Guided Survival Time Prediction of Brain Tumor Patients
Open accessAbstract
High-grade glioma is the most aggressive and severe brain tumor that leads to death of almost 50% patients in 1-2 years. Thus, accurate prognosis for glioma patients would provide essential guidelines for their treatment planning. Conventional survival prediction generally utilizes clinical information and limited handcrafted features from magnetic resonance images (MRI), which is often time consuming, laborious and subjective. In this paper, we propose using deep learning frameworks to automatically extract features from multi-modal preoperative brain images (i.e., T1 MRI, fMRI and DTI) of high-grade glioma patients. Specifically, we adopt 3D convolutional neural networks (CNNs) and also propose a new network architecture for using multi-channel data and learning supervised features. Along with the pivotal clinical features, we finally train a support vector machine to predict if the patient has a long or short overall survival (OS) time. Experimental results demonstrate that our methods can achieve an accuracy as high as 89.9% We also find that the learned features from fMRI and DTI play more important roles in accurately predicting the OS time, which provides valuable insights into functional neuro-oncological applications.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 11 · Cited by 282
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- [10]Srivastava N Salakhutdinov RR Multimodal learning with deep boltzmann machines NIPS 2222 2230 2012
- Authors
- Nie, D., Zhang, H., Adeli, E., Liu, L., & Shen, D.
- Affiliations
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
- Corresponding author
- Shen, Dinggang
- Venue
- Lecture Notes in Computer Science
- Publisher
- Springer International Publishing
- Published
- 2016
- Volume
- 9901
- Pages
- 212-220
- ISSN
- 0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
- 1611-3349
- PMC
- PMC5278791
- OpenAlex
- W2525157777
- Cited by
- 282
- References
- 11
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 35 · 2021: 41 · 2020: 45 · 2019: 41 · 2018: 32 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 3 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 55.67
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Lecture notes in computer science (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (R01EB008374)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Genetics › Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Brain Tumor Detection and Classification
- Keywords
- high-grade glioma, survival time prediction, overall survival, multimodal MRI, 3D convolutional neural networks, functional MRI, diffusion tensor imaging, T1-weighted imaging, automatic feature extraction, support vector machine, prognosis, neuro-oncology
- MeSH terms
- Deep Learning, Algorithms, Brain, Brain Neoplasms, Glioma, Humans, Life Expectancy, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Prognosis, Sensitivity and Specificity, Reproducibility of Results, Neural Networks, Computer, Neoplasm Grading, Multimodal Imaging
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review