Cited by 282Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical ImagingGlioma Diagnosis and TreatmentBrain Tumor Detection and Classification

3D Deep Learning for Multi-modal Imaging-Guided Survival Time Prediction of Brain Tumor Patients

Open access
Nie, Dong, Zhang, Han, Adeli, Ehsan, Liu, Luyan, Shen, Dinggang·2016·Lecture Notes in Computer Science

Abstract

High-grade glioma is the most aggressive and severe brain tumor that leads to death of almost 50% patients in 1-2 years. Thus, accurate prognosis for glioma patients would provide essential guidelines for their treatment planning. Conventional survival prediction generally utilizes clinical information and limited handcrafted features from magnetic resonance images (MRI), which is often time consuming, laborious and subjective. In this paper, we propose using deep learning frameworks to automatically extract features from multi-modal preoperative brain images (i.e., T1 MRI, fMRI and DTI) of high-grade glioma patients. Specifically, we adopt 3D convolutional neural networks (CNNs) and also propose a new network architecture for using multi-channel data and learning supervised features. Along with the pivotal clinical features, we finally train a support vector machine to predict if the patient has a long or short overall survival (OS) time. Experimental results demonstrate that our methods can achieve an accuracy as high as 89.9% We also find that the learned features from fMRI and DTI play more important roles in accurately predicting the OS time, which provides valuable insights into functional neuro-oncological applications.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-319-46723-8_25

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 11 · Cited by 282

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [10]Srivastava N Salakhutdinov RR Multimodal learning with deep boltzmann machines NIPS 2222 2230 2012

Authors
Nie, D., Zhang, H., Adeli, E., Liu, L., & Shen, D.
Affiliations
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Corresponding author
Shen, Dinggang
Venue
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
Published
2016
Volume
9901
Pages
212-220
ISSN
  • 0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
  • 1611-3349
OpenAlex
W2525157777
Cited by
282
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 35 · 2021: 41 · 2020: 45 · 2019: 41 · 2018: 32 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 3 · 2014: 1
FWCI
55.67
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Lecture notes in computer science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (R01EB008374)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Genetics › Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Brain Tumor Detection and Classification
Keywords
high-grade glioma, survival time prediction, overall survival, multimodal MRI, 3D convolutional neural networks, functional MRI, diffusion tensor imaging, T1-weighted imaging, automatic feature extraction, support vector machine, prognosis, neuro-oncology
MeSH terms
Deep Learning, Algorithms, Brain, Brain Neoplasms, Glioma, Humans, Life Expectancy, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Prognosis, Sensitivity and Specificity, Reproducibility of Results, Neural Networks, Computer, Neoplasm Grading, Multimodal Imaging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review