Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 351

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Deep Learning and Data Labeling for Medical Applications: First International Workshop, LABELS 2016, and Second International Workshop, DLMIA 2016, Held in Conjunction with MICCAI 2016, Athens, Greece, October 21, 2016, Proceedings

Open access
·2016·Lecture Notes in Computer Science

Abstract

This study addresses the recognition problem of the HEp-2 cell using indirect immunofluorescent (IIF) image analysis, which can facilitate the diagnosis of many autoimmune diseases by finding antibodies in the patient serum. Recently, a lot of automatic HEp-2 cell classification strategies including both shallow and deep methods have been developed, wherein the deep Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) have been proven to achieve impressive performance. However, the deep CNNs in general requires a fixed size of image as the input. In order to conquer the limitation of the fixed size problem, a spatial pyramid pooling (SPP) strategy has been proposed in general object recognition and detection. The SPP-net usually exploit max pooling strategies for aggregating all activated status of a specific neuron in a predefined spatial region by only taking the maximum activation, which achieved superior performance compared with mean pooling strategy in the traditional state-of-the-art coding methods such as sparse coding, linear locality-constrained coding and so on. However, the max pooling strategy in SPP-net only retains the strongest activated pattern, and would completely ignore the frequency: an important signature for identifying different types of images, of the activated patterns. Therefore, this study explores a generalized spatial pooling strategy, called K-support spatial pooling, in deep CNNs by integrating not only the maximum activated magnitude but also the response magnitude of the relatively activated patterns of a specific neuron together. This proposed K-support spatial pooling strategy in deep CNNs combines the popularly applied mean and max pooling methods, and then avoid awfully emphasizing of the maximum activation but preferring a group of activations in a supported region. The deep CNNs with the proposed K-support spatial pooling is applied for HEp-2 cell classification, and achieve promising performance compared with the state-of-the-art approaches.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-319-46976-8

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 351

Metadata

Venue
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
Published
2016
ISSN
  • 0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
  • 1611-3349
OpenAlex
W2522083379
Cited by
351
References
0
FWCI
8.81
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Deep Learning and Data Labeling for Medical Applications: First International Workshop, LABELS 2016, and Second International Workshop, DLMIA 2016, Held in Conjunction with MICCAI 2016, Athens, Greece, October 21, 2016, Proceedings. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/978-3-319-46976-8
The paper
Deep Learning and Data Labeling for Medical Applications: First International Workshop, LABELS 2016, and Second International Workshop, DLMIA 2016, Held in Conjunction with MICCAI 2016, Athens, Greece, October 21, 2016, Proceedings. (2016). Lecture Notes in Computer Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46976-8

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.