The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Collective Anomaly Detection Based on Long Short-Term Memory Recurrent Neural Networks
Abstract
Intrusion detection for computer network systems is becoming one of the most critical tasks for network administrators today. It has an important role for organizations, governments and our society due to the valuable resources hosted on computer networks. Traditional misuse detection strategies are unable to detect new and unknown intrusion types. In contrast anomaly detection in network security aims to distinguish between illegal or malicious events and normal behavior of network systems. Anomaly detection can be considered as a classification problem where it builds models of normal network behavior, which it uses to detect new patterns that significantly deviate from the model. Most of the current research on anomaly detection is based on the learning of normal and anomaly behaviors. They have no memory that is they do not take into account previous events classify new ones. In this paper, we propose a real time collective anomaly detection model based on neural network learning. Normally a Long Short-Term Memory Recurrent Neural Network (LSTM RNN) is trained only on normal data and it is capable of predicting several time steps ahead of an input. In our approach, a LSTM RNN is trained with normal time series data before performing a live prediction for each time step. Instead of considering each time step separately, the observation of prediction errors from a certain number of time steps is now proposed as a new idea for detecting collective anomalies. The prediction errors from a number of the latest time steps above a threshold will indicate a collective anomaly. The model is built on a time series version of the KDD 1999 dataset. The experiments demonstrate that it is possible to offer reliable and efficient collective anomaly detection.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hochreiter, S., & Schmidhuber, J. (1997) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco.1997.9.8.1735 · Cited by 102,318
Cited by
Deep Learning for Anomaly Detection: A Survey
Chalapathy, R., & Chawla, S. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1901.03407 · Cited by 1,240
Machine Learning and Deep Learning Methods for Cybersecurity
Xin, Y., Kong, L., Liu, Z., Chen, Y., Li, Y., Zhu, H., Gao, M., Hou, H., & Wang, C. (2018) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2018.2836950 · Cited by 1,228
Machine Learning and Deep Learning Methods for Intrusion Detection Systems: A Survey
Liu, H., & Lang, B. (2019) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app9204396 · Cited by 1,133
A Unifying Review of Deep and Shallow Anomaly Detection
Ruff, L., Kauffmann, J. R., Vandermeulen, R. A., Montavon, G., Samek, W., Kloft, M., Dietterich, T. G., & Muller, K.-R. (2021) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/jproc.2021.3052449 · Cited by 914
Machine Learning for Anomaly Detection: A Systematic Review
Nassif, A. B., Talib, M. A., Nasir, Q., & Dakalbab, F. M. (2021) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2021.3083060 · Cited by 748
Metadata
- Authors
- Bontemps, L., Cao, V. L., McDermott, J., & Le-Khac, N.-A.
- Venue
- Lecture Notes in Computer Science
- Publisher
- Springer International Publishing
- Published
- 2016
- Pages
- 141-152
- ISSN
- 0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
- 1611-3349
- OpenAlex
- W2535642622
- Cited by
- 245
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 15.18
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Collective Anomaly Detection Based on Long Short-Term Memory Recurrent Neural Networks. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/978-3-319-48057-2_9
- The paper
- Bontemps, L., Cao, V. L., McDermott, J., & Le-Khac, N.-A. (2016). Collective Anomaly Detection Based on Long Short-Term Memory Recurrent Neural Networks. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-48057-2_9
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.