Business Innovation Through Blockchain
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Comparing bureaucracy and blockchain-based authentication shows remarkable differences, especially about relying on private resources for providing a service of general interest.
“Comparing bureaucracy and blockchain-based authentication, one can see remarkable differences.Especially important appear to be those about relying on private resources for providing a service of general interest (see Morabito [39]).”
From Tribal Governance: The Business of Blockchain Authentication (2018) · cites this paper as [39]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 64 · Cited by 190
- Authors
- Morabito, V.
- Corresponding author
- Vincenzo Morabito
- Venue
- Springer eBooks
- Publisher
- Springer International Publishing
- Published
- 2017
- OpenAlex
- W4234044211
- Cited by
- 190
- References
- 64
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 34 · 2019: 36 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 3
- FWCI
- 24.65
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Springer eBooks (publishedVersion)
- DIAL (Catholic University of Leuven) (submittedVersion)
- Archivio istituzionale della Ricerca - Bocconi (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Blockchain Technology in Education and Learning
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Digital Innovation in Industries
- Keywords
- blockchain, business innovation, Bitcoin, value chain, blockchain governance, blockchain security, technology management, information systems
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review