The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
DevOps Adoption Benefits and Challenges in Practice: A Case Study
Open accessOverview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The perceived benefits of adopting DevOps found in the literature are Increased Release frequency, improved quality assurance (QA), and enhanced collaboration and communication.[19] [20] [21] [22] [23]”
From DevSecOps practices and tools (2025) · cites this paper as [21]
Citations
Cites
Recommended Steps for Thematic Synthesis in Software Engineering
Cruzes, D. S., & Dyba, T. (2011) · 2011 International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement · doi:10.1109/esem.2011.36 · Cited by 960
Continuous Delivery: Reliable Software Releases Through Build, Test, and Deployment Automation
Humble, J., & Farley, D. R. (2010) · Cited by 911
Microservices Architecture Enables DevOps: Migration to a Cloud-Native Architecture
Balalaie, A., Heydarnoori, A., & Jamshidi, P. (2016) · IEEE Software · doi:10.1109/ms.2016.64 · Cited by 735
Devops: A Software Architect's Perspective
Bass, L., Weber, I. M., & Zhu, L. (2015) · CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) · Cited by 561
Ebert, C., Gallardo, G., Hernantes, J., & Serrano, N. (2016) · IEEE Software · doi:10.1109/ms.2016.68 · Cited by 504
DevOps: A Definition and Perceived Adoption Impediments
Smeds, J., Nybom, K., & Porres, I. (2015) · Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-18612-2_14 · Cited by 158
Adopting DevOps practices in quality assurance
Roche, J. (2013) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/2524713.2524721 · Cited by 133
Continuous Delivery? Easy! Just Change Everything (Well, Maybe It Is Not That Easy)
Neely, S., & Stolt, S. (2013) · 2013 Agile Conference · doi:10.1109/agile.2013.17 · Cited by 124
Software Architecture in a Changing World
Woods, E. (2016) · IEEE Software · doi:10.1109/ms.2016.149 · Cited by 93
DevOps: Making It Easy to Do the Right Thing
Callanan, M., & Spillane, A. (2016) · IEEE Software · doi:10.1109/ms.2016.66 · Cited by 74
DevOps patterns to scale web applications using cloud services
Cukier, D. (2013) · doi:10.1145/2508075.2508432 · Cited by 52
Software Development as an Experiment System: A Qualitative Survey on the State of the Practice
Lindgren, E., & Münch, J. (2015) · Lecture notes in business information processing · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-18612-2_10 · Cited by 42
Iden, J., Tessem, B., & Päivärinta, T. (2010) · Information and Software Technology · doi:10.1016/j.infsof.2010.12.002 · Cited by 38
Cooperation between developers and operations in software engineering projects
Tessem, B., & Iden, J. (2008) · International Workshop on Cooperative and Human Aspects of Software Engineering (CHASE) · doi:10.1145/1370114.1370141 · Cited by 30
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Challenges and solutions when adopting DevSecOps: A systematic review
Rajapakse, R. N., Zahedi, M., Babar, M. A., & Shen, H. (2022) · Information and Software Technology · doi:10.1016/j.infsof.2021.106700 · Cited by 235
DevOps Capabilities, Practices, and Challenges: Insights from a Case Study
Senapathi, M., Buchan, J., & Osman, H. (2018) · Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering 2018 · doi:10.1145/3210459.3210465 · Cited by 172
Adopting DevOps in the real world: A theory, a model, and a case study
Luz, W., Pinto, G., & Bonifácio, R. (2019) · Journal of Systems and Software · doi:10.1016/j.jss.2019.07.083 · Cited by 164
DevOps critical success factors — A systematic literature review
Azad, N., & Hyrynsalmi, S. (2023) · Information and Software Technology · doi:10.1016/j.infsof.2023.107150 · Cited by 109
From DevOps to MLOps: Overview and Application to Electricity Market Forecasting
Subramanya, R., Sierla, S., & Vyatkin, V. V. (2022) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app12199851 · Cited by 79
Metadata
- Authors
- Riungu-Kalliosaari, L., Mäkinen, S., Lwakatare, L. E., Tiihonen, J., & Männistö, T.
- Affiliations
- University of Helsinki (FI)
- University of Oulu (FI)
- Corresponding author
- Riungu-Kalliosaari, Leah
- Venue
- Lecture Notes in Computer Science
- Publisher
- Springer International Publishing
- Published
- 2016
- Pages
- 590-597
- ISSN
- 0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
- 1611-3349
- OpenAlex
- W2546493083
- Cited by
- 154
- References
- 14
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1
- FWCI
- 3.96
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hdl.handle.net
- Locations
- Lecture notes in computer science (publishedVersion)
- Työväentutkimus Vuosikirja (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Software Engineering Techniques and Practices
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Software System Performance and Reliability
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Software Engineering Research
- Keywords
- DevOps adoption, release frequency, test automation, organizational culture change, communication barriers, employee welfare, rapid feedback, software quality, software development organizations
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review