Cited by 157Software Engineering Techniques and PracticesSoftware System Performance and ReliabilitySoftware Engineering Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

DevOps Adoption Benefits and Challenges in Practice: A Case Study

Open access

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-319-49094-6_44

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 157

Metadata

Authors
Riungu-Kalliosaari, L., Mäkinen, S., Lwakatare, L. E., Tiihonen, J., & Männistö, T.
Affiliations
  • University of Helsinki (FI)
  • University of Oulu (FI)
Corresponding author
Riungu-Kalliosaari, Leah
Venue
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
Published
2016
Pages
590-597
ISSN
  • 0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
  • 1611-3349
OpenAlex
W2546493083
Cited by
154
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1
FWCI
3.96
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Lecture notes in computer science (publishedVersion)
  • Työväentutkimus Vuosikirja (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Software Engineering Techniques and Practices
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Software System Performance and Reliability
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Software Engineering Research
Keywords
DevOps adoption, release frequency, test automation, organizational culture change, communication barriers, employee welfare, rapid feedback, software quality, software development organizations

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review