School refusal
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Categorical approaches broadly aim for within-category homogeneity and between-category qualitative differences, goals that have been somewhat elusive for SA/A.
“Categorical approaches broadly aim for within-category homogeneity and between-category qualitative differences (De Boeck et al., 2005), goals that have been somewhat elusive for SA/A (DiBartolo and Braun, 2017).”
From Reconciling Contemporary Approaches to School Attendance and School Absenteeism: Toward Promotion and Nimble Response, Global Policy Review and Implementation, and Future Adaptability (Part 1) (2019) · cites this paper as DiBartolo and Braun, 2017
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 72 · Cited by 3
- Authors
- Di Bartolo, C. A., & Braun, M. K.
- Affiliations
- Mount Sinai Hospital (US)
- Venue
- Pediatrician's Guide to Discussing Research with Patients
- Publisher
- Springer International Publishing
- Published
- 2017
- Pages
- 225-238
- OpenAlex
- W4236420620
- Cited by
- 3
- References
- 72
- Citations by year
- 2023: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 3.00
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Springer eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Youth Substance Use and School Attendance
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › School Health and Nursing Education
- Keywords
- school refusal, school anxiety, chronic absenteeism, truancy, risk factors, treatment, adolescents, parental separation anxiety, attachment
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
