CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 8Educational Games and GamificationAugmented Reality ApplicationsVirtual Reality Applications and Impacts

The Smartkuber Case Study: Lessons Learned from the Development of an Augmented Reality Serious Game for Cognitive Screening

Open access
Boletsis, Costas, McCallum, Simon·2017·Lecture Notes in Computer Science
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-60922-5_36
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-319-60922-5_36

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The game elements of competition could improve motivation significantly.

    “The game elements of competition could improve motivation significantly [94].”

    From Extracting Design Guidelines for Augmented Reality Serious Games for Children (2022) · cites this paper as [94]

  • In the study of [94], the use of feedback mechanics, such as points and rewards, motivated players strongly in AR serious games.

    “For example, in the study of [94], the use of feedback mechanics, such as points and rewards, motivated players strongly in AR serious games, while we suggested AR designers replace this kind of feedback with 3D feedback.”

    From Extracting Design Guidelines for Augmented Reality Serious Games for Children (2022) · cites this paper as [94]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Boletsis, C., & McCallum, S.
Affiliations
Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NO)
Corresponding author
Boletsis, Costas
ORCID
Venue
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published
2017
Pages
457-472
ISSN
  • 0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
  • 1611-3349
DOI
10.1007/978-3-319-60922-5_36
OpenAlex
W2623664381
Cited by
8
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2019: 2
FWCI
1.73
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Lecture notes in computer science (publishedVersion)
  • NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Educational Games and Gamification
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Augmented Reality Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
Keywords
augmented reality, serious games, cognitive screening, older adults, game design, interaction techniques, test validity, gaming motivation, cognitive decline detection

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review