CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 12Speech and dialogue systemsIntelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive LearningEFL/ESL Teaching and Learning

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Communication Strategies and Affective Backchannels for Conversational Agents to Enhance Learners’ Willingness to Communicate in a Second Language

Ayedoun, Emmanuel, Hayashi, Yuki, Seta, Kazuhisa·2017·Lecture Notes in Computer Science
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-61425-0_40
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-319-61425-0_40

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The study by Ayedoun et al. (2017) reported high motivation.

    “| (Ayedoun et al., 2017) | Teaching agent, chatbot driven N/A | High motivation | |”

    From Interacting with educational chatbots: A systematic review (2023) · cites this paper as Ayedoun et al., 2017

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. MacIntyre, P.D., Clément, R., Dörnyei, Z., Noels, K.A.: Conceptualizing willingness to communicate in a L2: a situational model of L2 confidence and affiliation. Mod. Lang. J. 82(4), 545–562 (1998) · DOI · Paper page
  2. Ayedoun, E., Hayashi, Y., Seta, K.: Web-services based conversational agent to encourage willingness to communicate in the EFL context. J. Inform. Syst. Educ. 15(1), 15–27 (2016) · DOI
  3. Dörnyei, Z., Scott, M.L.: Communication strategies in a second language: definitions and taxonomies. Lang. Learn. 47(1), 173–209 (1997) · DOI
  4. Smith, C., Crook, N., Dobnik, S., Charlton, D.: Interaction strategies for an affective conversational agent. Teleoperators Virtual Environ. 20, 395–411 (2011). MIT Press · DOI
  5. McCroskey, J.C.: Willingness to communicate, communication apprehension, and self-perceived communication competence: conceptualizations and perspectives. In: Daly, J., et al. (eds.) Avoiding Communication: Shyness, Reticence, and Communication Apprehension, pp. 75–129. Hampton Press, Cresskill (1997)

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Ayedoun, E., Hayashi, Y., & Seta, K.
Affiliations
Osaka Prefecture University (JP)
Corresponding author
Ayedoun, Emmanuel
ORCID
Venue
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published
2017
Pages
459-462
ISSN
  • 0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
  • 1611-3349
DOI
10.1007/978-3-319-61425-0_40
OpenAlex
W2692684678
Cited by
12
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2020: 2
FWCI
0.24
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (unspecified)
Locations
Lecture notes in computer science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech and dialogue systems
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
Keywords
willingness to communicate, second language learners, chatbots, communication strategies, dialogue management, language learning, affective computing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review