Cited by 53Geotechnical Engineering and Soil StabilizationConcrete and Cement Materials ResearchGeotechnical and construction materials studies

Stabilization of an Expansive Soil Using Alkali Activated Fly ash based Geopolymer

Parhi, Partha Sarathi, Garanayak, Lasyamayee, Mahamaya, Mahasakti, Das, Sarat Kumar·2018·Sustainable Civil Infrastructures

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-319-61931-6_4

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Parhi, P. S., Garanayak, L., Mahamaya, M., & Das, S. K.
Affiliations
  • Indian Institute of Technology Hyderabad (IN)
  • National Institute of Technology Rourkela (IN)
Corresponding author
Parhi, Partha Sarathi
Venue
Sustainable Civil Infrastructures
Published
2017-07-12
Pages
36-50
ISSN
  • 2366-3405 (ISSN-L)
  • 2366-3413
OpenAlex
W2734589279
Cited by
53
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 2
FWCI
7.38
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Sustainable civil infrastructures (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Concrete and Cement Materials Research
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Geotechnical and construction materials studies
Keywords
expansive soil, soil stabilization, alkali-activated fly ash, geopolymer, sodium hydroxide, sodium silicate, unconfined compressive strength, grouting, rheological properties, setting time, industrial waste utilization, Class F fly ash

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review